THEGAYUK

Author: Alan Taylor-Jones

  • CAR REVIEW | Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Break

    The Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake is a bit of a mixture. Based on the A-Class Hatchback, the normal CLA is a four-door saloon with the swooping roofline and dramatic looks you’d expect from a coupe. So what does the Shooting Brake bit mean? This is an old term that has come to mean an estate car that puts style on an equal level of importance to practicality. Think of it as a four-door coupe with room for a short dog.

    From the windscreen forward, you can clearly see the Shooting Brake is based on the A-Class; not necessarily a bad thing. From the windscreen back, the roof sweeps gently down as it approaches the tailgate which itself is heavily raked. Despite this and a narrow opening, there is a decent amount of space in the boot however back seat passengers may feel a little claustrophobic. Taller occupants in the rear may feel their head brushing against the roof too.

    Up front there are no complaints. Despite this being towards the lower end of the Mercedes range, fit and finish is excellent with everything laid out in a logical and easy to understand manner. Some may find the steering wheel column mounted stalk that controls the seven-speed automatic gearbox a little odd (it took some getting used too), but this is normal for Mercedes.

    Not only is the interior well put together, it’s a fantastic place to spend time in. Even after a few two hour journeys with plenty of traffic, I was still more than happy to jump back in the Shooting Brake. The infotainment system proved easy to use with its rotary controller although it could be a little slow to respond to inputs at times. The menus were clear and attractive while the sat-nav worked faultlessly though.

    A range of petrol and diesel engines are available but I decided to try the most powerful diesel, the 220 d. It’s the same size as the lower powered 200 d at 2.1 litres but here produces 175 bhp to give a brisk 0-62 time of 8.3 seconds. Coupled to a fast acting seven-speed auto, it felt a lot quicker than those numbers suggest. Not only was it quick, it proved capable of around 50mpg on a long trip if you were careful with the throttle.

    It was under gentle loads the diesel engine felt most at home. Should you demand hard acceleration, the gearbox could sometimes prove a little too keen to change down a few gears revealing a coarse edge to the diesel motor. It was pretty loud too. There was a ‘sport’ mode but this tended to leave the car in too low a gear which exacerbated the problem. In the end I just left it in ‘eco’ and enjoyed the low to mid-range torque rather than let the engine rev.

    As for the handling, the Shooting Brake cornered quickly with little roll but never felt like it was happy to be hustled along. Ride comfort was good on smooth motorways but elsewhere it was less impressive. Despite being fitted with the smallest available wheels, rough surfaces and big bumps caught the suspension out causing a rough ride. I would have happily traded some of that roll resistance in corners for a softer ride.

    There’s a lot to love about the CLA Shooting Brake. It’s a good looking take on the estate car while the interior really is quite special. That Mercedes could combine such potent performance with a lack of thirst is impressive too. Unfortunately, while I could live with the narrow boot opening and occasionally noisy engine, the tuning of the car’s suspension really lets it down. At nearly £31,000 before options, it’s also pretty expensive. Even so, I’d still be tempted.

     

    LOVES

    Looks

    Economy

    Cabin ambience

    LOATHES

    Expensive

    Noisy

    Crashy ride

    LOWDOWN

    Car – Mercedes-Benz CLA 220 Shooting Brake

    Price – £30,930

    Power – 175bhp

    0-62mph – 8.3 seconds

    Top Speed – 142mph

    Co2 – 108g/km

    Find out more at Mercedes-Benz

  • CAR REVIEW | Mercedes AMG A38

    As potential performance cars go, the first generation Mercedes A-Class is not a vehicle that immediately springs to mind.

    (more…)

  • CAR REVIEW | Volvo V60

    ★★★★ | Volvo V60

    Estates have taken a bit of a battering in the last few years.

    It seems that these days the default choice for those needing more room for cargo, dogs or dead bodies is a chunky crossover rather than a long-roofed car. All is not lost though, Volvo (who else?) is now offering a dash of off-road appeal to its V60 estate with this Cross Country model.

    So what does it take to make the Cross Country variant? First, the suspension is jacked up by 65mm, not a vast amount but enough to give a noticeably loftier viewpoint on the world. Next, Volvo add silver skidplate effect bumpers front and rear with matching side skirts. Finally, you get chunky mud and snow tyres beneath plastic wheel arch extensions. All-wheel drive is an option but only on the most powerful engine.

    While those changes may not sound like much, they do toughen up the V60 by a significant amount giving it a little more presence on the road. That the normal V60 is a pretty handsome thing doesn’t hurt at all. Inside feels very well put together and is attractive in a sober, Swedish kind of way. It may not immediately appeal but it proved to be a wonderfully calming, well-made environment in which to clock up the miles. This was helped by excellent seats with plenty of adjustment, clear instrumentation (especially with the optional TFT dials) and easy to follow sat-nav.

    Our test car came with keyless entry and start. As long as the key was on you, you could unlock the car with a tug of the door handle and fire up the engine with the push of a button. You could even lock it again without the key fob in your hand. Nice. Once I was inside and ready to set off, I did notice the gearstick seemed a little bit too far back in the cabin with the cupholders unhelpfully beneath your arm as you changed gear.

    On the road, the gearchange action itself was long but not unpleasant. Not that you had to stir the stick much, even with the lowest power engine the V60 CC proved surprisingly rapid. The 150hp unit may have been a little loud (although easily masked by a quality sound system) but had plenty of grunt; it always seemed faster than the 9.1 second sprint to 62mph suggested. Unfortunately thanks to those chunky tyres, there was a bit of torque steer and a fair amount of wheelspin even in second gear.

    Pushing the V60 CC around bends highlighted the issues with putting a car on stilts. Turning the car into a bend over a crest could unsettle the rear while it did float a little over bumps too. The steering was well weighted but lacking any real feedback. To be fair though, it’s unlikely you’d buy one of these for its handling prowess. In a relaxed cruise it proved effortlessly comfortable, refined and pretty economical too. Over my usual mixed route, I was averaging around 44mpg. It’s just a shame that rough road surfaces did make things get a little jiggly. Yes, you can call it that.

    I was also a little disappointed with the load space, or rather the lack of it. Don’t get me wrong, there’s still plenty more than something like a Ford Focus hatchback but not anywhere near as much as you’d think for a car of this size. Unfortunately in giving the V60 its svelte shape at the rear, boot space has been sacrificed. At least the cargo bay is a decent shape with no lip. On the subject of negative points, while the V60 CC range starts at £30,000, you’re looking at around £35,000 for an AWD model.

    In summary, there’s a lot to like about the V60 Cross Country. The driving experience and high-quality interior combine to offer a relaxing experience while real world economy is more than acceptable. While you could argue that not offering AWD with all engines is a bit of an oversight, most people will buy these for the looks rather than for any off-road ability. Rivals may be cheaper but I doubt they’d feel quite this plush. Is it worth the premium? I think for many the answer will be yes.

     

    Loves

    Relaxing to drive

    Performance

    Looks

    Loathes

    Boot smaller than expected

    Lack of traction

    The Lowdown

    Car – Volvo V60 Cross Country D3 SE Nav

    Price – £30,995 (£35,545)

    Power – 150hp

    0-62mph – 9.1 seconds

    Top Speed – 127mph

    Co2 – 111g/km

  • CAR REVIEW: Alfa Romeo 4C

    If you’ve stopped staring at the picture and started reading, you might be wondering what the incredibly sexy automobile in front of you could be. ★★★★

    With something as low, lithe and purposeful as this, you might be expecting it to have a prancing horse on the badge and a price tag of over £150,000. What will surprise some of you is that this is, in fact, an Alfa Romeo with a starting price of not much more than £50,000.

    You may associate Alfa with a range of small hatchbacks but their history is full of sports and racing cars. The 4C featured here is the latest from the Italian marque and one that aims to bring excitement back to driving. While it may be a throwback in some respects – there’s not even any power assistance for the steering – it’s a thoroughly modern vehicle. Underneath the achingly beautiful body is a chassis made out of carbon fibre, the stuff they make Formula One cars out of.

    Fold yourself through the door opening and into the heavily winged driver’s seat and you’ll be just a few inches off the floor. The view out of the curved windscreen is dominated by the rising front wings and the plunging nose. Look in the door mirrors and you can see straight into the dramatic scoops that feed the engine and keep the intercooler chilled. As for the rear view mirror, you could just about see flashing blue lights approaching but not much else.
    The cabin itself is sparse with plenty of exposed carbon fibre, a TFT instrument cluster in front of you and not much else. You do get electric windows, air conditioning, a stereo and the option of leather seats but the luxuries stop there. For storage, there’s a compact glovebox with another small compartment in between the seats. Other than that, there’s just a pair of cupholders inside and a boot big enough for a couple of squishy bags. Practical it isn’t.
    Directly between the rear seats is the same 240bhp four cylinder 1750 TBi engine found in the Giulietta QV coupled to a six-speed semi-automatic gearbox with steering wheel mounted paddles. Those hoping for a manual gearbox should look elsewhere. While you might think that engine isn’t exotic or powerful enough given the mini-supercar looks, the reality is quite different. Thanks to the carbon construction, the 4C weighs less than a tonne.
    To put that into perspective, launch control helps the 4C get from 0-62mph in a mind-blowing 4.5 seconds. All you need to do is select ‘Dynamic’ mode on the three-way ‘DNA’ switch (‘Natural’ and ‘All Weather’ modes are also available), plant your left foot on the brake and flatten the throttle with your right foot. The revs rise to around 3,000 at which point you come off the brake. Assuming its dry, the 4C then finds amazing traction and hurls you towards the horizon while making some great noises.
    Not all aspects of driving this Alfa are quite as simple though. The unassisted steering is heavy at parking speeds and although it soon gets lighter, it constantly writhes about in your hands. While there’s no doubt it engages you in driving the car, the inexperienced will be intimated by the way it follows every little tramline and camber in the road. Although you soon learn that a little wandering is natural and grip the wheel less tightly, you can never relax in this car.
    The upshot of this comes in the shape of steering feel that shames almost every modern car I’ve driven. You always know what the front wheels are doing even as the limit of grip approaches while the speed of the rack helps catch any little slides you may encounter. Don’t get me wrong, it isn’t a drift monster but it is very easy to unstick the rear tyres coming out of junctions for instance. In ‘Dynamic’ mode (even with the traction control on) you’ll find yourself having to feed in opposite lock before the computers sort things out. It might sound scary but it becomes good fun very quickly.
    Not that you have to be travelling quickly to have fun. On several occasions on familiar roads it felt like I was hammering along only to look at the speedo and see surprisingly low number. If you did want to make those numbers bigger (on a track of course), then you really need to concentrate and work hard. For many it’ll be too much effort especially when compared to the likes of a Porsche Cayman. For me, it was addictive in a way few cars are. It really is an adrenaline pump virtually all the time.
    Despite this, fuel consumption was astonishingly good. On one thirty mile plus journey, I was able to coax nearly 40mpg out of the 4C without having to try too hard and keeping pace with traffic at all times. Even driven hard, the average refused to drop below 25mpg. Thank the relatively small engine and tiny kerb weight for that. There aren’t many rivals that can match that real world fuel consumption, that’s for sure.
    Does this make the 4C a car you could have as your everyday car though? I would argue not. Although the sensory overload is great when you’re in the mood, a day behind the wheel left a friend and I tired and with headaches. Storage space is limited at best and it isn’t easy to get in and out of. I would also bet that while being the centre of attention wherever you go was great fun during my time with the 4C, it would get old quite quickly.
    Would I have one though? Without any shadow of a doubt; the 4C makes you feel alive like little else on the road.
    Loves
    Looks
    Acceleration
    Economy

    Loathes

    Loud

    Impractical

    Can be a handful

    The Lowdown 

    Car – Alfa Romeo 4C

    Price – £51,500

    Power – 240bhp

    0-62mph – 4.5 seconds

    Top Speed – 160mph

    Co2 – 157g/km

    Reviewed by Alan Taylor Jones / October 2015

  • CAR REVIEW | Alfa Romeo Giulietta QV

    ★★ | Alfa Romeo Giulietta QV

    It seems the default choice for a premium hatchback these days is Teutonic in origin. Whether it has a three-pointed star, four rings or a blue and white roundel, the Germans seem to have the market all wrapped up.

    What if you want some passion with your prestige though? Step forward the Italians with the gorgeous Giulietta.

    A competitor to the Audi A3 and Mercedes A-Class, the Giulietta is a five-door hatchback pretending to be a sporty three-door. The nose is reminiscent of the 8C & 4C sportscars with subtly sculpted flanks leading to an attractive rear end with distinctive tail lights. We’re not looking at any old Giulietta however, this is the top Quadrifoglio Verde (QV for short) model. Meaning ‘cloverleaf’ in Italian, it’s been the symbol of the most athletic Alfas since 1923.

    The Giulietta QV gains a couple of big bore exhaust pipes, sporty side skirts and 18” wheels, in this instance glorious teledial items that hark back to fast Alfas past. These items and cloverleaf badges on the front wings aren’t the only things that mark out the QV though. Under the bonnet is the same 1750 TBi turbocharged four-cylinder engine and six-speed dual clutch TCT gearbox that’s found in the 4C. Like in the mid-engined two-seater it has 237bhp; enough for a 0-62 mph time of six seconds dead.

    Driving the QV up to around seven-tenths pace, all seems good. You wouldn’t ever call it soothing but it strikes a good balance between ride comfort and handling. Yes, you do feel bumps but sharp edges are rounded off nicely and the car feels pretty agile. The gearbox shuffles between ratios smoothly and the steering is nicely weighted if not dripping with feeling.

    You can calm things down further by switching from ‘Natural’ to ‘All Weather’ modes on the three-way ‘DNA’ drive mode selector. This blunts performance but does tend to be the best choice for day to day use, ‘Natural’ seemingly always in a gear lower than you want when you’re being sensible. It also puts the traction and stability modes on high alert should conditions get slippery. It’s the ‘D’ in ‘DNA’ that’s most interesting though; that stands for ‘Dynamic’.

    Not only does it make the engine even more responsive, it reduces the assistance of the power steering to add weight and gets the electronic limited slip diff working as hard as it can to improve traction. There’s even a launch control mode that (in theory) makes that 0-62 time easily achievable. Just put your left foot on the brake, give it full throttle and then step off the brake. The computers will do the rest.
    Assuming you’re on a nice flat piece of tarmac with lots of grip, there’s plenty of flashing from the traction control light in first gear before it hooks up in second and flies making a fantastic noise in the process. Try accessing the performance on rougher roads especially in the wet and things get a little crazy. The differential isn’t a true limited slip diff, instead, it works by braking the front wheels individually seriously limiting progress and causing the nose to wander too.

    Pile into a corner really hard and the QV always seems safe but never really feels like it wants to play. Only braking deep into a corner will get any movement from the tail and you can’t turn off the traction and stability control either. The upshot is that it never feels like it’s going to throw you off the road but then never is it truly exciting – not unless you’re hard on the throttle with the steering wheel writhing in your hands and trying to stop it pulling you into a ditch.

    Still, you can count on Alfa Romeo for a stylish and driver focussed interior, can’t you? Errr no, not in this case. For starters, it’s like a coal bunker inside with an all black dashboard, black seats and a black headlining too. There may be some colourful piping on the disappointingly unsupportive seats but it’s not enough to lift the interior ambience. Some cheap plastics don’t help either. In the centre of the dash is a touchscreen infotainment system which works well enough but is trumped by newer rivals. Overall it feels a couple of generations old which isn’t really acceptable in a car that was facelifted just over a year ago. At least the boot is a decent size and rear legroom adequate.

    As a fan of much of Alfa Romeo’s back catalogue, I really wanted to like the Giulietta. I’ll even go as far as to admit to being prepared to overlook a few foibles and the stiff £28,000 price tag for a bit of Italian flair and excitement. Look past the good looking exterior and fantastic engine and you’re sadly left with a car that was at best mid-pack when it was introduced around five years ago. Fast forward to now and it’s way behind the pack in almost all areas. Alfa may be looking to facelift the Giulietta again but really they need to put it out of its misery and pull the plug.

     

    LOVES

    Engine
    Looks
    Not the obvious choice

    LOATHES

    Expensive
    Dated interior
    Could be more entertaining to drive

    LOWDOWN

    Car – Alfa Romeo Giulietta Quadrifoglio Verde
    Price – £28,120
    Power – 237bhp
    0-60 – 6.0 seconds
    Top Speed – 151mph
    Co2 – 162g/km

    Reviewed by Alan Taylor Jones /Sept 2015

  • CAR REVIEW | Volkswagen Beetle Cabriolet 1.2 TSI

    The Volkswagen Beetle has been around for over seventy years now with this being only the third all-new variant. ★★★

    Although the original Beetle soldiered on until 2003 in Mexico, we Europeans got the second generation car back in the late nineties. Whilst that traded on the rounded, cutesy looks of the original, it was considered way too feminine for many. Volkswagen looked to change that with this third generation car we first saw back in 2011.

    This model saw a few of the curves squared off while the roof line was dropped significantly to give it a more coupe-like profile. Naturally, if you really wanted to get the roof low, there was always the convertible we’re looking at here. The third generation of Beetle is available with a wide variety of petrol and diesel engines ranging between 1.2 and 2.0 litres. In this instance, we’re looking at the entry-level petrol version hooked up to the seven-speed automatic gearbox.

    You might think a 1.2-litre engine may seem small for a Golf-sized cabrio but a turbocharger gives performance that is more the adequate 90% of the time. Only when pulling onto a dual carriageway with a particularly short slip road do you feel like more power is needed. Slow your pace a little and the engine always feels willing, never seeming to struggle with inclines as some smaller engined cars do. The quick shifting and buttery smooth automatic gearbox helps greatly. There are steering wheel mounted paddles to shift up and down, however, I think I used them once.

    The main reason for leaving it in auto mode is that spirited driving is not the Beetle’s forte. Not only does it take nearly 12 seconds to reach 60mph, it’s never particularly entertaining around corners either. Sure, there’s prodigious amounts of grip but it never feels overly happy being thrown about. There’s precious little feedback from the steering and the suspension has most definitely been set up for comfort not cornering.
    Don’t get me wrong though, it’s unlikely you’d ever buy one instead of a sports car so why should it handle like one? Driven at a more leisurely pace you can enjoy the supple suspension ironing out bumps, let the gearbox shuffle through the gears and marvel at the lack of creaks and groans coming from the car’s structure. You’d expect some floppiness from hacking the roof off but the Beetle remains pleasantly stiff even up the roughest of roads. As an added bonus, you can raise or lower the roof at up to 31mph too.

    This feeling of quality permeates throughout the cabin with every button, stalk and switch operating with the kind of well-oiled precision the Germans do so well. Body coloured panels inside also help lift the interior and hark back to the original Beetle. The optional infotainment system as fitted to our test car proved easy to use with little to no lag plus great sound quality from the upgraded Fender sound system. This car also had Apple CarPlay and Android Auto for even greater Smartphone connectivity.
    For me though, the most important option by far was the heated seats that came as part of a winter pack. Being able to open the roof on a clear yet bitterly cold morning with my back and bottom being gently toasted as the sun rose was a real highlight of my time with the Beetle. Tempting as raiding the options list is, care is needed. All in all our test vehicle had over £3,000 of options fitted pushing the price up to over £26,000. Over £1,200 of that was on the audio and infotainment system alone.

    Another downside is reduced practicality thanks to the convertible roof. Gone is the wide-opening hatchback and instead is a small boot-lid that can make unloading objects deep in the luggage compartment tricky. I would also recommend giving the rear seats a try before you buy. I’m sure they’re fine for occasional use but I found them to be very upright and not overly comfortable. Headroom was fine even with the roof up but then I am less than 5’ 4”.

    There’s a good chance that your decision to buy a Beetle Cabriolet will come down to one thing, the looks. At around £1,000 more than a more practical Golf Cabriolet, you really need to love the styling to pick the Beetle over it. If the Bug does take your fancy, then it’s an undoubtedly well-made and comfortable cabrio that is certainly a little different. Thrill-seekers should look elsewhere, however.

     

    Pros

    Premium feel

    Comfortable

    Smooth auto gearbox

    Cons

    Could do with a little more power

    Cramped rear seats

    Can get pricey with options

    The Lowdown

    Car – Volkswagen Beetle Cabriolet Design 1.2 TSI

    Price – £23,070 (£26,375 as tested)

    Power – 105hp

    0-60 – 11.7 seconds

    Top Speed – 111 mph

    Co2 – 127g/km

  • CAR REVIEW | Subaru BRZ, 30 MPH has never been so fun

    Ask a petrolhead to think of Subaru and rallying won’t be too far from the forefront of their mind. ★★★★★

    The Japanese firm’s turbocharged, four-wheel drive saloons and hatchbacks are a familiar sight on special stages across the globe. This competition pedigree doesn’t go to waste, their road cars benefit from lessons learnt from rallying too. This however, is a very different kind of Subaru.

    While there may be the familiar 2.0 litre flat-four boxer engine up front, there is no turbo. Nor is there four-wheel drive, just the rear tyres are powered. The expected levels of four or five-door practicality are absent as well, there may be four seats (just) but these are accessed by only two doors. Welcome to the BRZ.

    At this point, the more observant of you might be feeling a little déjà vu. That’s because the BRZ has a brother, a car that I’ve already tested – the Toyota GT86. There are three very good reasons for sampling this Subaru though. Firstly, the BRZ is completely standard, unlike the GT86 I tried. Secondly, the Subaru is different in its suspension setup and thirdly, I was desperate for another go with this chassis.

    Like the GT86, the Subaru BRZ has 200hp at a heady 7,000rpm, a six-speed manual gearbox (an auto is available) and a limited slip differential to help channel the power to the road. Visually the cars look very similar at first glance although the front bumper, faux wing vents and badges are different. Inside, there are different dials, dashboard trim and infotainment systems.

    In the case of the test car, infotainment is pushing it somewhat. There’s no sat-nav, Bluetooth or even a touchscreen, just an AM/FM radio, CD player plus an aux-in and iPod connectivity. With most people now possessing Smartphones with navigation included, I don’t think this is too much of an issue. The rest of the interior is well made but unmistakably Japanese – an Audi TT it isn’t.

    The BRZ is a very different proposition to the TT though. Not only is it up to £5,000 cheaper, the Subaru puts driving dynamics above all else. Drop into the low-set and fantastically figure hugging sports seat and you’ll notice the peaks of the front wings show you exactly where the centres of the front tyres are. Thumb the starter button and the engine fires into a distinctive idle, the scene is set.

    Slot the gearstick into first and you can’t help but notice the short, mechanical feeling action that will become very familiar. Unlike modern turbocharged engines that deliver power from what feels like little over idle, the naturally aspirated flat four thrives on revs. While it will pull from under 2,000rpm, you need at least 4,500rpm on the dial before it starts to feel genuinely quick.

    It’s once you get to a set of corners that everything clicks though. The BRZ rides on the same kind of tyres that are fitted to the Toyota Prius meaning there isn’t vast amounts of grip. That may seem strange for a sports car but it’s this that makes it such a blast. Unlike many performance cars, you don’t have to be travelling at ludicrous speed for things to get interesting.

    Even going well within the speed limit, you can feel the chassis working under you. Initially you’ll feel the front run wide but a little bit of commitment will soon see the car oversteering in a wonderfully controllable manner. Never does it feel scary yet it excites and entertains in equal measure. The steering may feel a little odd around the straight ahead but it proves quick and with enough feedback to know exactly what is going on up front.

    Despite the stunning handling, the BRZ is also a lot more comfortable than you’d expect too. You do feel bumps but they are smothered well enough while the car never feels crashy. Compared to the tweaked GT86 I tried, it’s a revelation – you could genuinely use it every day. There’s also a surprisingly large boot and the promise of near faultless reliability as well.

    Naturally, there are downsides. While the boot is decently sized, the gap is quite narrow and the seats don’t fold forward a great deal. Trying to squeeze a not overly big box into the back was quite a hassle. It’s also thirsty (I averaged just under 35mpg), not as well equipped as many hot hatchbacks and slower too. As for the rear seats, they’re suitable for children or the shortest of adults only.

    As you may have guessed already, for me the positives far outweigh the negatives here. Sure it could be more practical but at the end of the day, it’s a coupe. To make a car look like this, practicality will be sacrificed. As for performance, there’s plenty of aftermarket parts out there to make it as fast as you want. Me? I’d be tempted to leave it standard; I’ve never known a car entertain so much at less than 30mph. I want one so badly it hurts.

    Pro

    Handling

    Styling

    Price

    Cons

    Not overly practical

    Thirsty

    It isn’t mine

    The Lowdown

    Car – Subaru BRZ SE Lux

    Price – £23,995

    Power – 200hp

    0-62mph – 7.6 seconds

    Top Speed – 143mph

    Co2 – 181g/km

  • CAR REVIEW | Mini Cooper S

    It seems barely believable that the first ‘new’ MINI was launched fifteen years ago before going on sale in 2001.

    Since that car’s introduction, we’ve seen the release of cabriolet, coupe, roadster and even crossover models with the iconic nametag. At the core of the range has always been the three-door hatchback, something which isn’t changing any time soon. All the more reason to look at this model, especially in potent Cooper S guise.

    Now on its third generation, the MINI has grown in all dimensions when compared to its predecessors to give improved safety and more room inside. While lesser models have shrunk in the engine department, the Cooper S now has a 2.0 litre turbocharged engine under the bonnet. Unsurprisingly power and torque are increased although not at the expense of fuel economy according to MINI.

    From the outside, the new model is unmistakably a MINI. Although it may have puffed-out cheeks and rear lights that look too big for the tail of the car, it’s still a cute little thing. Being a Cooper S, there are twin tailpipes out back, a jutting front spoiler and of course a letterbox air-intake on the bonnet. Inside will be recognisable to many as well; there’s the familiar circular theme running through the interior along with the usual row of toggle switches.

    It all feels more premium than ever before inside especially if you start opting for some of the swankier trim pieces. One option I’d definitely recommend is the head-up display that projects your speed, sat-nav instructions and other information directly into your line-of-sight. Anything that lets you keep your eyes on the road is a good thing in my book. I loved the rotary controller for the infotainment system too, much easier than a touchscreen. While it may be bigger inside, the boot is still on the small side while taller adults may be cramped in the rear seats.

    Not that you generally buy a MINI for practicality of course. Alongside those retro looks, you’ll probably be drawn to the driving dynamics the brand has always prided itself in. Despite the increase in size, the Cooper S still proves a playful companion on a country road, especially with the driving mode dialled round to ‘sport’. There are also ‘mid’ and ‘green’ modes for when you want to drive normally or as fuel efficiently as possible.

    It’s with the Cooper S in ‘sport’ that it really comes alive though. Throttle response is sharpened to allow you to tap into all 192bhp with ease while the exhaust makes some fantastic pops and crackles when you come off the throttle. The steering may not be as communicative as older versions but it is precise and well weighted. Handling is neutral but ultimately safe although there is still noticeable torque-steer at times. Overall I found it to be huge fun though.

    It isn’t all good news however. On top of the small boot, it can get expensive; you can easily spend over £25,000 with a few choice options ticked. While the MINI comes with a decent amount of standard kit including air-con, a Bluetooth connection and even a digital radio, many will want to spend more to get sat-nav, bigger wheels and other items to personalise their car. Economy won’t be brilliant with the Cooper S either; enjoy yourself and expect to average a low 30’s mpg figure. This is at least on par with other similar hot hatchbacks.

    In summary, the MINI is still a more style-led choice of hatchback than a Ford Fiesta or even Audi A1 for example. While it may not have quite as much space as many rivals and can become expensive quickly, it’s impossible to dislike once you’ve spent a decent amount of time behind the wheel. Not only does it drive well, the interior is well made and attractive too. It’s also worth remembering the One and Cooper models are cheaper to buy and run should you not be interested in going quickly. If you’re searching for a supermini, the MINI has a lot going for it.

    Pros

    Handling

    Interior quality

    Infotainment system

    Cons

    Inflated looks

    Small boot

    Gets expensive with options

    The Lowdown

    Car – MINI Cooper S

    Price – £18,840

    Power – 192bhp

    0-62mph – 6.8 seconds

    Top Speed – 146mph

    Co2 – 133g/km

  • CAR REVIEW | Renault Captur Dynamique Media Nav

    The Renault Captur is proving a popular choice amongst those after an alternative to a common-or-garden hatchback.

    Based on the same platform as the Clio supermini, it’s a similar length but both wider and taller. Engines mirror the Clio range with 900cc and 1.2 litre turbocharged petrol engines along with a 1.5 litre diesel on offer. It may be competitively priced but is it any good?

    First impressions are positive; the exterior is smartly styled with an attractive take on the Renault corporate ‘face’, nicely sculpted sides and pert rear. There’s even the option of a contrasting roof and coloured highlights on the wheels for those that want to stand out. The Captur may ride higher than the Clio it’s based on but don’t think it has any off-road ability. There isn’t even the option of four-wheel drive.

    Move inside and everything is laid out pretty sensibly apart from the switch to toggle between the cruise control and speed limiter; this was unhelpfully between the front seats. Still, the heater controls are easy to use and the infotainment isn’t mounted too far down the dashboard like some rivals. It’s not overly exciting but it is attractive enough, especially with the piano black trim and body coloured highlights of higher trim levels.

    The Captur is practical too, the boot is a decent size and the seats naturally fold down. Cleverly, they also slide back to give rear passengers more legroom albeit at the expense of carrying capacity. It is however in the cabin where the Captur’s cheap price really shows. Closer inspection reveals acres of hard plastic while the infotainment system looks exceedingly dated compared to rivals. It works well enough though.

    On the road, the Captur proves a comfortable companion that only got caught out by particularly rough surfaces. Not only could it deal with bumps well, it resisted wallowing too. You’d never call it engaging though; the steering provided little to no feedback as to what the front wheels were doing and I couldn’t turn off the traction or stability control. Although that may not be of too much concern to many of you, I found the traction control cut in far too quickly leaving you accelerating out of junctions far slower than you’d expected.

    While it may sound like there’s too much power for the chassis, that isn’t the case at all. Initially, the 1.5-litre diesel seemed quite punchy around town but this feeling soon disappeared on the open road. Despite a quick and enjoyable gearchange, a 0-62 time of 13.1 seconds means getting up to motorway speeds can be a bit of a chore and a noisy one at that. Economy hovered at just under 50mpg on a mixture of roads. Not bad at all for a real world test if somewhat below the official figure of more than 70mpg.

    Still, the Renault does have price on its side. Even before discounts, you can pick one up new for a little over £14,000 which is very competitive indeed. Opt for a decently specced mid-range model and you’ll still be looking at under £18,000 for a vehicle with air-con, sat-nav and cheap running costs. With that in mind, you can forgive a lot of the negative points of the Captur. It’s easy to see why it’s so popular, that’s for sure.

    PROS

    Inexpensive

    High driving position

    Looks

    CONS

    Slow

    Cheap feeling interior

    Dated looking infotainment system

    The Lowdown

    Car – Renault Captur 1.5 dCi Dynamique Nav

    Price – £17,695 (£18,964 as tested)

    Power – 110hp 0-62mph – 11.0 seconds

    Top Speed – 109mph

    Co2 – 98g/km

  • CAR REVIEW | Vauxhall Corsa VXR – The Four Wheeled Hooligan. We Love It.

    ★★★★ | Vauxhall Corsa VXR

    The Vauxhall Corsa is a familiar sight on UK roads; no surprise considering it’s the second best-selling car of 2015 with over 57,000 having found homes this year.

    Although the majority of buyers will be drawn to the low purchase price, cheap running costs and smart (if inoffensive) looks, there’s a variant that adds something extra, excitement. Step forward the VXR.

    Originally launched back in 2007 and heavily reworked along with the rest of the Corsa range at the start of 2015, the VXR takes aim at cars such as the Fiesta ST and MINI Cooper S. Compared to these, it looks something of a bargain at just shy of £18,000. That may be slightly pricier than the ST but it offers more power and a level of standard equipment higher than the cheapest fast Ford. For serious driver’s there’s also the optional ‘Performance Pack’ that’s fitted to our test car.

    Regardless of options, the VXR comes with a muscular 205hp from the 1.6 litre turbocharged engine, enough for 0-62mph in a rapid 6.5 seconds. That’s almost half a second faster than the Fiesta ST and enough to make the VXR very entertaining. The engine is certainly effective but lacks the kind of aural fireworks that make for a truly great motor. It’s also some way behind rivals in terms of carbon emissions and economy. While I did manage 40mpg on a long run, my average for a week was nearer 35mpg. A heavy right foot can see this drop below 30.

    Still, it’s unlikely you’d buy a hot hatch for cheap running costs. Of more interest will be how it goes round bends, an area the Performance Pack really helps with. For £2400, you gain bigger Brembo brakes, stiffer suspension, larger wheels with sticky Michelin Pilot Super Sport tyres and a race bred Drexler limited-slip differential.

    Opt for the pack and the first thing you’ll notice is the suspension; those after a comfortable life should look elsewhere. In day to day use the VXR is very stiffly sprung and can get a little bouncy at times. The pay-off is fine body control when you’re going for it with very little roll and a neutral balance, a good thing considering the vast reserves of grip the tyres serve up.

    For me it was the Drexler diff that made the biggest difference. Unlike electronic systems that simply slow a spinning wheel with a dab of brakes, this mechanical device prevents one wheel spinning by locking up making them spin together. Not only does this improve traction but it actively pulls the nose of the car into bends where a normal car would start understeering.

    Eventually the nose does run wide but the amount of speed you can carry up to that point is incredible. The VXR may be fast and great fun to throw around but it’s never the most talkative of companions, you’re much more likely to have the wheel writhing with torque steer than sending gentle messages about what the road surface is doing.

    Style wise, the VXR wants you to know how quick it is. There are gaping intakes and a chin spoiler up front, a faux diffuser and a couple of big exhaust pipes out back, side skirts, a big rear spoiler and 17 or 18” inch wheels barely hiding those big Brembo brakes. For real boy racers, there’s even a pack that adds carbon fibre effect flourishes to the grille and mirrors. If it were a person it would most definitely be wearing a tracksuit and chunky gold jewellery. It would be an attractive chav though.

    The interior is dominated by a pair of figure-hugging Recaro seats (leather is a £1045 option) that along with the chunky leather steering wheel really set the scene. A leather handbrake grip and gearstick gaiter are nice additions although the gearknob itself was a bit too big for my dainty hand. The upper half of the dashboard is nicely finished in soft touch plastics with piano black and chrome trim helping it seem quite upmarket at first.

    This illusion is somewhat undermined the first time you reach for the cheap feeling heater controls or feel the hard and scratchy black plastic that covers much of the doors and lower dash. This isn’t an expensive car however and you do get a lot of performance kit for your cash, with that in mind it’s just about acceptable.

    Those wanting their hot hatch to be as practical as possible should bear in mind the VXR is three door only, While that undoubtedly helps the looks, the heavily winged seats don’t lean forwards very far making rear entry tricky. Space in the back isn’t terrible though and the boot is far bigger than you’d get in a MINI too.

    To sum up, the Corsa VXR Performance Pack feels a bit like a four wheeled hooligan. The exterior styling is brash, it can be physical to drive and it’s a little rough around the edges inside too. On the flip side, it’s vast amounts of fun, fast and not too expensive either. If you’re so inclined, I think it would be an absolute riot on a track day and you’d probably surprise some more expensive metal too. Come and have a go if you think you’re ‘ard enough.

    Pros

    Exciting to drive
    Good value
    Looks like a hot hatch should

    Cons

    Coarse engine
    Expensive to run
    Could be more feelsome

    The Lowdown

    Car – Vauxhall Corsa VXR Performance Pack
    Price – £17,995 (£21,590 as tested)
    Power – 205hp
    0-60 – 6.5 seconds
    Top Speed – 143 mph
    Co2 – 174g/km

    You might also like:

    Reviewed by Alan Taylor-Jones

  • CAR REVIEW | Mazda CX 3

    Mazda are one of the latest manufacturers to produce a competitor for Nissan’s popular Juke crossover.  ★★★★

    Called the CX-3, it promises a more upmarket feel inside and out when compared to the little Nissan or the Renault Captur. Beneath the distinctive styling is the platform of the Mazda2 supermini albeit without that car’s smaller engines.

    While the CX-3 may be roughly the same length as the Mazda2, a more upright seating position gives noticeably more room front and rear along with a bigger boot. Even so, you wouldn’t want to cram three adults in the back for too long especially if they’re tall. Think of it as good for its size but bear in mind a similarly priced Skoda Yeti would give even more space inside.

    The Skoda wouldn’t have quite the same level of style as the Mazda though. While the Yeti doesn’t look bad, the CX-3 is a handsome little thing (even in refrigerator white) that avoids looking like its trying too hard to be different like some competitors. Those looks are carried through to the cabin which proved to be a very pleasant environment to be in. There’s a good selection of high quality plastics and leather effect materials but a few too many hard and scratchy surfaces considering the £17,000 plus price tag.

    The infotainment system is worth a mention though. The screen is touch sensitive but there’s also a rotary controller between the front seats similar to BMW’s iDrive system. It takes a little getting used to at first but proves much more accurate than prodding at a screen over bumpy roads. Menus are attractive and the sat-nav worked very well too; it all seemed a cut above systems from many rival manufacturers including premium brands.

    While an unusually large 2.0 litre petrol engine is available with two power outputs, I selected a 1.5 litre diesel to test. This 105hp unit will likely be the volume seller of the range thanks to its combination of punchy performance and the promise of over 70mpg in front wheel drive guise. Four wheel drive is available but you really need to ask whether the economy and emissions penalty is worth it. Unless you live out in the country or down the end of a farm track, I’d argue it isn’t.

    You might think 105hp isn’t a great deal of grunt but then the CX-3 doesn’t weigh a vast amount; this means 0-62mph takes just 10.1 seconds. It never feels fast but then it never wants for more power either. There’s plenty of grunt from low in the rev-range which makes for easy-going progress on motorways too. As with all cars these days, you won’t be matching the official fuel consumption figures but I still managed 50mpg over around 300 miles on a mixture of roads. I don’t hang about either.

    Unfortunately, handling proved to be a bit of a mixed bag. There’s a fair amount of body roll but it always feels keen and willing to entertain around corners. Over long undulations at speed it feels quite soft and wallowy which lulls you into thinking this will be a comfortable car. Unfortunately over more pronounced bumps and rough surfaces, it tends to fidget and bounce more than you’d expect. A Renault Captur would be more comfortable for sure although I still preferred the Mazda’s sense of fun. It could be better though.

    The Mazda CX-3 is a very likeable little car. I was impressed by the combination of real-world economy and performance on offer; it really was a surprise when compared to rivals. I also felt it looked great inside and out even though the colour did it no favours at all. Unfortunately it is expensive compared to rivals and doesn’t quite have the fit and finish inside to justify the price. I also felt the suspension setup seemed a little unfinished. The MX-5 shows Mazda can clearly make a car that handles, a little of that magic wouldn’t go amiss here. Even so, it’s still my favourite baby crossover.

    Pros

    Handling

    Styling

    Economy

    Cons

    Expensive compared to rivals

    Interior feels cheap in places

    Pricey

    The Lowdown

    Car – Mazda CX-3 1.5 2WD SE-L Nav Diesel

    Price – £20,995 (£21,535 as tested)

    Power – 105hp

    0-62mph – 10.1 seconds

    Top Speed – 110mph

    Co2 – 105g/km