Author: James Perrett

  • Gay Marriage laws still not equal in England and Wales

    Gay Marriage laws still not equal in England and Wales

    The law concerning same-sex marriage and divorce in England and Wales still isn’t equal as statistics show same-sex divorce is on the rise.

    gay men getting married
    CREDIT: dolgachov bigstock

    Same-sex marriage may only have been legal for four years but divorces have taken a sharp increase, according to a new report from the Office of National Statistics released this month. James Perrett dives into the data and chats to three law firms to find out what we know so far.

    There’s a little-documented fact about divorce that may come as a surprise to the LGBTQ+ community. Despite same-sex marriages being introduced into law in England and Wales in 2014, adultery cannot be used as grounds for divorce of a same-sex couple because the law defines adultery as “sexual intercourse with a person of the opposite sex.”

    The latest data from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) shows the number of divorces between same-sex couples in England and Wales last year was 338, more than three times the number in 2016 which was 112.

    “Adultery” doesn’t legally count for same-sex divorce

    Unreasonable behaviour was the most common reason that same-sex couples gave for divorcing, accounting for 83% of divorces among women and 73% among men. But how many of those divorces cited unreasonable behaviour because adultery was not an option?

    Helen Habershon, senior associate at Barlow Robbins in Woking, told me it may not be that simple.

    “A key fault in the system is that not only can you not petition for your own adultery, you also have to get the person who committed adultery to admit it.

    “They don’t have to name who the other person is, but they do have to admit it on the form that the court sends them.

    “Many times, if there’s any worry or risk that the other person won’t admit the adultery, I always advise that they proceed on the grounds of unreasonable behaviour.

    “So, although in a same-sex marriage they can’t use adultery as a reason, I’m not sure how significant that actually is.

    “Because of everything that has to go with adultery, you’re invariably in some way or another going to submit an unreasonable behaviour petition.”

    But she added: “It is ridiculous that it’s limited to what the law says, in that it must be intercourse with the opposite sex, because it’s still the affair, the lack of intimacy, the breach of trust.”

    When you petition for divorce, you’re required to prove your marriage has suffered an irretrievable breakdown and then give one of the following reasons: adultery (in heterosexual marriages); unreasonable behaviour; desertion; separation of two years without consent or separation of five years, for which no consent is required. You also have to have been married for more than one year before petitioning for divorce.

    According to the ONS statistics, the average (median) number of years of a same-sex marriage before divorce in 2017 was 3.5 years for men and 2.8 years for women.

    “It could be that some people have been together a long time and they get married so that they can have children.” Helen suggested. “Things like IVF and adoption can put a strain on a relationship.”

    “Law is based on 1973 legislation”

    But for Zahra Pabani, partner and family law expert at Shakespeare Martineau, the current law isn’t just discriminatory to same-sex relationships.

    “I would say it’s as frustrating for heterosexual couples as it is for homosexual couples,” she said. “Our law is based on 1973 legislation, it has not moved with the times for same-sex or opposite-sex couples.

    “It’s frustrating for everybody, not just the gay community – maybe more so because they can never claim for adultery but it’s frustrating for everybody.”

    She added that the high numbers for same-sex divorce may be down to the excitement around the law finally coming to pass, after many years of hard campaigning.

    “Everybody got terribly excited that they could get married,” she said. “So I think sometimes the relationship might not have been great but you try to salvage it by getting married.

    “I see that in opposite-sex couples who have been living together for a really long time then try to refresh the relationship by getting married and the relationship breaks down quickly. It doesn’t matter what sexual orientation you are, lots of people do that.

    “There was a flurry of gay marriage but it wasn’t always for the right reasons, not because they’re gay; everybody does it.”

    Gay parents can have added discrimination

    © DGLimages Depositphotos

    Where the law is discriminatory, she argues, is when it comes to single people trying to become a parent.

    “It’s much harder to apply for a parental order if you’re single, gay or straight,” she said. “As a woman, you could try to get yourself pregnant but if you’re a man and you do it by getting a friend pregnant it’s much, much harder for you because the law will always favour the person carrying the child.

    “Even harder if you were a gay woman who couldn’t carry a baby so you used a surrogate, because you’re not the person carrying it.”

    Zahra is a Resolution lawyer, part of a body that advocates a non-confrontational approach to divorce, and said people petitioning for divorce should first try to reach a settlement out-of-court, either directly through their partner, or through a good solicitor.

    *Divorce statistics from ONS are derived from information recorded by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service during the divorce process

  • COMMENT | Is Gay Twitter just too darn cliquey?

    What is it about that phrase “apply for membership” that is simultaneously repugnant and intriguing? It’s like my personality splits instantly; one-half goes “urgh” and walks away, the other is halfway through typing an application form detailing why it is I would be great for this club and frantically trying to find ‘cool’ photos to upload to Instagram.

    But those clubs make money from being exclusive; “Gay Twitter™”, however, does and should not.

    So why, oh why, are gays still trying to syphon themselves off from the rest of life? Why do people include an ACTUAL TRADEMARK after ‘Gay Twitter’? These are all questions I ask myself as I scroll through my Twitter feed each morning.

    My issue is with some of the influential members of ‘Gay Twitter’ and the damage I feel they’re doing to what we strive to keep an open, encompassing community.

    But, still, my issue isn’t with the idea of the name ‘Gay Twitter’ itself; that’s just the title for a demographic of Twitter users, really. My issue is with some of the influential members of ‘Gay Twitter’ and the damage I feel they’re doing to what we strive to keep an open, encompassing community.

    Looking for inspiration, guidance and I’ll be honest some networking opportunities, I started following a few of the editors, sub-editors, contributors etc of certain successful flagship LGBT+ publications on Twitter. While I was expecting to be inspired as a wannabe-editor, I’m continually disappointed by what I can see is just one big clique. “Unfollow them!” you say? Why? I’d have nothing to write about.

    I watch these intelligent, prominent writers spend all day @ing each other in tweets; usually about an in joke and/or anal sex. And when their followers try to chime in? Oh, don’t expect a response unless you’re someone they have/want to/are going to shag. Didn’t we grow out of that somewhere after GCSEs? Haven’t we gays all had enough of feeling left out of a social group when we were at school?

    What upsets me the most is that some of these are the people running the publications that I looked up to when I was desperate to get out of small town life and be one of them. For example, Gay Times has a print readership of 170,000 people; 869,411 web page views and a social media following reaching into the millions*.

    That’s millions of people in their sphere of influence that they’re either peacocking in front of or ignoring completely.

    Now don’t get me wrong, the beauty of Twitter is that it’s an unfiltered stream of consciousness and it’s your own personal account but they cannot deny that they’re in the public eye (hello? You have a big blue tick next to your handle!) These guys are writers after all; write something that young gays will look up to! When there’s so much out there with the potential to damage young minds and yet, even more, channels for them to reach out through, how about show the next generation how to be dignified LGBT+ people by tweeting something that doesn’t involve you being a bitch? How about using your high profile for charitable good, or to highlight issues from the community? I’d love to hear a voice that isn’t just cynicism and sycophantism.

     

    ‘Gay Twitter’ needs a wakeup call: engage, inspire, broaden some knowledge – because the elitism is hurtful.

     

    The private members’ clubs I get: being exclusive is literally their business, it’s in the title. But ‘Gay Twitter’ needs a wakeup call: engage, inspire, broaden some knowledge – because the elitism is hurtful.

    While I’m at it, dear publishing Lords, give me a man topless on the cover of a gay lifestyle magazine who doesn’t have abs! But that rant is for another day when I haven’t eaten a Five Guys straight after the gym.

    *Gay Times Publishers Statement July 2015

     

    Opinions expressed in this article may not reflect those of THEGAYUK, its management or editorial teams. If you’d like to comment or write a comment, opinion or blog piece, please click here.