Tag: Three Star Car Review

The latest Three Star Car Review from THEGAYUK.

  • CAR REVIEW | Fiat 500s Convertible

    If I were to ask you to list small car icons, I would bet my trousers that two names would be at or near the top of the list; the MINI and the Fiat 500.

    As you may have guessed from the accompanying pictures, it’s not the bite-size Brit we’re looking at here (don’t worry, I’ll be covering that soon enough) but the eeny-meeny Italian. Specifically we’re looking at the sporty ‘S’ variant with in this instance a convertible roof. With the basic design now eight years old, is it still a competitor in the stylish supermini stakes?

    There’s one good reason why the 500 has proved such a success for Fiat; its looks. Launched exactly 50 years after the original, it cleverly references the much smaller 50’s 500 without appearing to be a caricature of itself like the MINI. That the 500 is taller than much of the competition helps to keep the proportions right while also giving plenty of headroom.

    While the 500 has always traded on cutesy looks and retro charm, those wanting a bit more aggression without the performance or price of the hot Abarth versions should definitely check out the ‘S’. Sitting near the top of the range, it gains much manlier bumpers packed full of vents, satin chrome trim as well as some racy side skirts and stylish 15” alloy wheels. Inside are sports seats, 7” TFT display for the driver, alloy gear knob, a chunky flat-bottomed leather steering wheel and lashings of red stitching.

    S spec also gets an exclusive colour option – Electronica blue – which proved slightly controversial among friends. While it’s undoubtedly a great colour, some questioned its suitability on such a retro shape. They may have a point. What is undeniable is the effectiveness of the dinky 900cc TwinAir petrol engine. Although less than a litre in capacity and with only two cylinders, a turbocharger pushes power to 105 hp and 107 Ib ft of torque when Sports mode is engaged.

    Without this button pressed, the 500 feels very different, power drops to 98 hp while torque plummets to 89 Ib ft. Throttle response feels quite lazy which coupled with very light steering makes the car feel almost asleep. The aim of the game is, of course, maximum economy, the digital display in front of you even shows an eco score along with your current mpg and range. It’s certainly effective but hides the car’s true character.

    Sport mode on, the steering takes on a bit of extra heft while throttle response is transformed. There’s still a little delay as you’d expect with a turbocharged motor but after that the 500 surges forward. The high-mounted gearlever may seem odd at first but is fantastically placed for quick gearchanges and has a fantastic shift action. The TwinAir lump up front makes a rorty noise that seems to egg you on into driving it harder, something you’ll gladly do. There’s even a g-meter and boost gauge on the TFT screen to replace the eco stuff.

    Eager is the best way I can describe the handling and indeed the overall driving experience. The 500 feels darty and agile with strong grip and little roll, enjoyable on a country road and perfection for city streets. You do pay for the handling in ride comfort though, it’s by no means uncomfortable but you do feel undulations while the rear end can get bouncy over bigger bumps.

    Should you want to go topless, the electric sliding soft top moves rearwards at the touch of a button even on the move. Press it again and the whole hood folds above the boot lid giving, even more, exposure although it does remove almost all rearward visibility in the process. Unlike the Mini Cabrio, the whole roof doesn’t fold back, only the centre section. It may rob you of some of the openness a ‘proper’ cabriolet will give you but it does make for a stiffer structure. You do still feel the odd tremor from the chassis though.

    The fabric roof also prevents the fitment of a hatchback. Instead, you get a small upwardly opening boot lid that leads to a boot barely any smaller than the regular 500’s. Move forward into the cabin and you’ll find two comfortable rear seats with acceptable levels of legroom for the class. Up front is well laid out but lacking the quality feel of a MINI or even a VW Up! At least the bits you interact with most, the leather wheel and metal gear knob feel good in your hands.

    Unfortunately, the 500 TwinAir’s biggest weakness is highlighted by one of its strongest assets, how fun to drive it is. If you’re driving Miss Daisy and not working the turbo hard, then more than 50 mpg is possible. If however, you start having fun and lean on the throttle harder, economy tumbles significantly. Not only can it be expensive to run, it’s quite pricey to buy too.

    You can pick up a basic 500 for just over £10,000 but you’ll need to add another £3,000 for the convertible top and over £1,600 for S trim. You can’t even get the 105 hp motor in lower trim levels and that’s over £1,600 more too. After a handful of options, the test car came in at £17,430, a figure you could easily push higher with some of the personalisation on offer.

    Of course, you might look at it the other way, there are not many other open-topped cars out there that can be picked up for comfortably less than £20,000. There’s also no denying the charm of the 500 and enjoyment you get out of driving it. You can’t say that about certain cars costing more than twice as much. Objectivity isn’t something that will necessarily come into play in the purchase of a 500 though. For some the looks will be more than enough, thankfully beauty, in this case, is more than skin deep.

    PROS

    Punchy engine

    Styling

    Fun to drive

    CONS

    Can be thirsty

    Pricey

    Cheap interior plastics

    The Lowdown

    Car – Fiat 500S Convertible

    Price – £16,740 (£17,520 as tested)

    Power – 105 hp

    0-60 – 10 seconds

    Top Speed – 117 mph

    Co2 – 99g/km

  • CAR REVIEW | Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV

    148 miles per gallon. That is the official fuel consumption figure for Mitsubishi’s Outlander PHEV, an amazing figure for a big, heavy four wheel drive vehicle.

    Coupled to road tax that will currently cost you nothing, exemption from the London congestion charge along with a tiny 5% benefit in kind rate for company car drivers and it’s no surprise that they’re an increasingly common sight on our roads. It all sounds too good to be true, is it?

    Naturally you’ll be wondering how such a big 4×4 could possibly achieve such tiny fuel consumption. The key is in the name, specifically the PHEV bit; that stands for Plug in Hybrid Electric Vehicle. Under the boot floor is a battery pack large enough to power the Outlander for 32 miles without once relying on petrol power. Unlike many other hybrids, this battery doesn’t just get charged by the engine, you can plug it into the mains too.

    Once the electricity is all gone, there’s a conventional 2.0 litre petrol engine that can act solely as a generator to charge the battery, drive the wheels or a combination of both. The trouble is that if you rely too much on the engine the fuel economy starts to drop off a cliff. After a long drive on the motorway and with the battery virtually empty the economy dropped to just under 36mpg, a figure that is bettered by the majority of diesel SUVs.

    So is it all smoke and mirrors? In a word, no. If you’re one of the millions of motorists who don’t even manage 30 miles a day then the vast majority of journeys will cost you pence in electric rather than pounds in petrol. If you’re lucky enough to work somewhere you can plug it in then you can effectively double that range. According to Mitsubishi’s maths, on a single charge, 106 miles is the point at which a diesel would be more economical.

    For most people then, it’s a cheap car to run. It’s not terribly expensive considering the sheer size and complexity of it either. The cheapest Outlander PHEV is less than £29,000 yet still comes with keyless entry, 18” alloys, climate control, Bluetooth and iPod connectivity. Start to climb the range for niceties like sat nav, a premium audio system and swathes of leather and the price starts to get very close to £40,000 before options. BMW and Mercedes territory then.

    At first glance it’s pretty convincing. Externally it’s a quietly handsome shape that shys away from some of the crazier flourishes seen on other SUVs. There’s a little chrome but not enough to be garish giving a classy overall look. Inside the top spec GX5h test vehicle there’s red leather seats with matching trim on the dash, doors, steering wheel and even cupholders. It’s attractive enough but the level of finish is undoubtedly behind premium rivals. Wrinkly leather is not nice.

    Rear seat passengers are treated to vast amounts of legroom but seats that are an odd shape and quite hard too. Still, this was a fresh car so maybe a bit of use would soften them up. Behind the seats is a huge boot but no option of a third row of seats due to the battery pack. Oddly, you still get a couple of cupholders back there, however. The top half of the range also benefits from a powered tailgate that can be opened and closed from the key fob, handy.

    Those of you that love a bit of tech might also appreciate the Mitsubishi Remote Control on higher trim levels that lets you schedule charging, check battery levels and even turn the air conditioning on remotely through your smartphone. To accompany this you also get a 7” touchscreen infotainment system with sat nav that proved easy to work once you got to know it a little. The uprated Alpine speakers in the test car provided great sound quality too.

    To drive the Outlander proved to be a well-engineered bit of kit. Even with drive switching between petrol and electric acceleration was smooth without nasty jolts while noise levels were generally low. A flattened throttle pedal gets the engine screaming thanks to a CVT gearbox that keeps the engine at peak power, effective but loud. There’s also a little lag between nailing the throttle and actually getting full power. Not an issue under normal driving but slightly frustrating when trying to accelerate onto a busy roundabout for instance. It isn’t particularly quick either, 0-60mph takes around 11 seconds.

    Handling wise there is less body roll than you might expect but still noticeably more than a normal car or a BMW X3 for that matter. Although fairly neutral when cornered hard, it predictably understeers at the limit for safe if uninvolving progress. Still, this isn’t going to be a car you buy for fun, if driven sensibly you appreciate how easy it is to drive and how quiet it is. With decent ride comfort as well, it’ll prove good enough for most prospective owners.

    Should you buy one then? Well to benefit from the potential fuel savings you need to be able to plug it in somewhere and not be travelling too far too regularly. If that applies to you then there’s plenty to recommend. Even looking past the potential fuel savings, the Outlander looks good, is well equipped for the money and overall feels well made (looking past some of the iffy interior trim). No wonder they’re selling so well.

    PROS

    • Huge inside
    • Cheap to run. Mostly.
    • Well equipped

    CONS

    • Expensive on long journeys
    • Not as premium feeling as some rivals
    • Uninspiring to drive

    THE LOWDOWN

    • Car – Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV GX5h
    • Price – £38,399 on the road (after £5,000 government grant)
    • Power – 200bhp (combined)
    • 0-60 – 11.0 seconds
    • Top Speed – 106mph
    • Co2 – 44g/km
  • CAR REVIEW | Zoe, Renault Electric dreams? Living with the Renault Zoe

    The electric car has seen a significant rise in popularity in recent years. Once seen as the preserve of milk floats and mobility scooters, advances in battery technology have increased range, reduced charging time and made electric vehicles seem a viable option.

    The question is how do they perform in the real world? Only one way to find out….

    Renault’s Zoe is an all-electric supermini that is around the same length and width as a Clio (they even share a platform) but a bit taller. You wouldn’t call it an MPV or a crossover but you do find yourself looking over the roofs of most other cars meaning visibility is excellent. Thanks to clever packaging of the batteries, motor and other mechanical bits there’s plenty of space inside. Front seat passengers will be able to stretch out and even wear a hat while those in the back won’t be much worse off. It’s no limo but it’s certainly better than you’d expect from this size of car. Open the boot and you’ll be pleasantly surprised again; it’s huge for a supermini although the load lip is a little high and does without a plastic trim. It’s a minor thing but I’d worry about scratching the paint when loading something heavy or bulky. More of an annoyance are the pair of charging leads in bags either side of the boot.

    Other manufacturers can hide them away so why can’t Renault?
    Style wise I think Renault are onto a winner. There are a few touches such as the blue rear lights and ‘ZE’ (zero emissions) badge that suggests electric propulsion but unlike cars like the G-Wizz or Renault’s own Twizy, these aren’t overt. Instead, you get a nicely sculpted shape that hides its height well. The only angle I’m not keen on is the rear; the feature lines that flank the number plate and lead into the bumper make it look a bit jowly. Inside is light, airy and modern with visually appealing plastics. Sure they’re hard to the touch but then you have to remember the cheapest Zoe is less than £14,000 including a £5,000 government grant. Even the top of the range model barely breaches £20,000. You’d spend an awful lot more on an electric Golf which would be a lot more austere too. At that price, you do need to lease a battery pack at between £70 and £113 a month. If you want to buy the battery outright then add £4500 to the base price.

    Renault’s 7” ‘R-Link’ infotainment system works well being easy to navigate, easy to pair a phone to via Bluetooth and lacking any sort of lag other systems sometimes suffer from. Sat-nav is an option but a CD player is not. For me, this isn’t really a problem as streaming music is simple plus you can always use the USB or aux port conveniently placed above a cubbyhole perfect for your media device. Conventional dials have been replaced by another TFT screen which I found clear and easy to use. There’s even a gauge to show you how much juice you’re using and when you’re charging the batteries whilst slowing down. This becomes a very useful tool when you’re looking to maximise the car’s range.

    Speaking of range, Renault suggests that on average you’ll need to charge up every 80 miles. In practice, this distance is totally achievable as long as you change your driving style to suit electric power. Gentle acceleration and deceleration is vital as is maintaining your speed where possible. While this may sound like hassle, the reality is that it’s actually pretty relaxing. You soon get used to barely touching the brake pedal, instead relying on the car’s regenerative brakes that harvest energy as you start coasting. What may grate is that air-con and heating take a chunk out of the range; not an issue on short commutes but potentially a worry on longer journeys. Still, chargers are popping up all the time and the most powerful can squeeze 80% of a full charge into the Zoe in 30 minutes.

    So what’s it like to drive? Being electric there’s only one forward gear plus reverse with no clutch at all. I suppose you could compare it to an automatic (there’s only a throttle and brake pedal) but with totally seamless acceleration. Performance below 40mph is actually pretty brisk, feeling much quicker than the numbers suggest. Over 40 it does struggle a little as the torque drops off significantly. 70mph is achievable but it drains the battery very very quickly; it’s better to stick to 60 or below and relax. The ride is fairly comfortable although the stiff sidewalls of the low profile economy tyres mean potholes and expansion joints can thump through the suspension into the cabin. There is a fair amount of body roll if you push it hard around a corner but it never feels unstable thanks to the low mounted batteries. You’d never call it fun or involving but it is very competent and not at all unpleasant, perfect for commuting in other words.

    With that in mind, it’s commuting that I did plenty of in my week with the car. Renault will supply all Zoes with a fast charger as plugging it into a normal electric socket gives a charging time of 16 hours. Thankfully I had access to a fast charger which ensured the car was always 100% charged at the end of the working day.

    In total, I travelled nearly 400 miles and came away very impressed. Only once did I suffer from any ‘range anxiety’ but even then I was able to get to a charger which topped up the battery enough to get me home after less than 45 minutes.

    Make no mistake, the Zoe won’t be for everyone. If you need to go more than 80 miles in a day and/or spend a lot of time on motorways then you’re better off sticking to a diesel. For the rest of us – a sizable majority – then the Zoe does make sense. It’s quiet, refined, easy to drive and very spacious while the styling is significantly nicer than the vast number of ‘eco’ cars. If I were in the market for a new supermini, the Zoe would be a serious contender.

    PROS

    Spacious

    Easy to drive

    Fast charging times
    Cons

    CONS

    Range could still be better

    Not much fun

    Charging cable storage could be better

  • Putting The 2015 Ford Focus Through Its Paces

    The common or garden hatchback has had a bit of a rough time of late. With everyone and their dog all after a high-riding SUV like the Nissan Juke or a ‘premium’ hatch like the BMW 1-Series, mass market offerings such as the Focus can be overlooked. The question is, should you ignore the current trends and give one of the old favourites a chance?

    First impressions are very good, the new corporate Ford grille has been criticised for looking a little bit too Aston Martinish (is that really a problem?) but here it’s handsome with just the right amount of aggression.

    Our test car was also painted a striking metallic blue and shod with some tasty 18” alloys wrapped in low profile rubber. Climbing inside this top spec Titanium X model, you are welcomed by a chunky leather steering wheel, half leather seats and Ford’s Sync 2 combined navigation and infotainment system, something you can read more about in June’s tech special issue of The Gay UK Magazine. There’s plenty of nice squishy plastic although premium car fans won’t be impressed by some of the cheaper plastics on the centre console and lower reaches of the dashboard. You can tell the range starts at less than £14k that’s for sure. Nevertheless, there’s plenty of space, everything is clearly laid out and not unattractive either.

    Keyless go means you don’t have to insert a key, just have the fob on you and thumb the starter button.

    The 2.0 diesel fires quickly and settles into a subdued idle, you still know it’s an oil burner but refinement has come a long way even in the last 5 years. Our test car came with Ford’s Powershift dual clutch automatic gearbox, similar to VWs DSG system and promising similar benefits. In almost all situations it smoothly shuffles between ratios with a noticeable shortening of shift speed in sport mode. There’s a built in ‘creep’ mode like an old school auto which makes manoeuvring easy with the car even holding you on the brakes for a hill start. Economy should be as good if not better than the manual too.

    The only fly in the ointment is if you go from pottering about to suddenly needing a burst of acceleration, something that can make the gearbox hesitate for a moment before delivering the performance you need. It never actually caused me an issue but does knock your confidence in pulling out onto a busy roundabout or carrying out an overtake. Sport mode helps but does tend to leave the car in too low a gear while the manual control buttons on the shifter don’t feel particularly intuitive. I get the feeling the optional wheel mounted paddles would be the ideal solution and make you feel like Lewis Hamilton to boot.

    The Focus has always been renowned for its handling so I had high hopes for this latest model even as a diesel estate. As with most new cars these days, the steering is electrically assisted. It’s nicely weighted and gives some feedback of what the road is doing but does feel a little gloopy just off the straight ahead like the wheels are turning in treacle. It’s a minor gripe however and one that most people wouldn’t even notice. In terms of fun and balance, I found the car hampered by having too much grip. This may seem like an odd thing to say but you have to be going seriously quickly to feel the inherent balance of the chassis.

    Once I had found my testicles and chucked it into a bend at speed you could feel the chassis working hard at both ends, resisting the urge to plough straight on and putting a very big grin on my face. I think smaller wheels would not only mean you can have more fun more of the time but you’ll also save a few quid replacing tyres and get a comfier ride. Although the Focus coped well with larger bumps and undulations, sharper ridges could thump through the cabin thanks to those skinny sidewalls. For the majority of people on the majority of journeys though, the Focus would prove to be a safe companion that you’d have to do something very stupid in to get out of shape round a bend.

    Overall the Focus made a compelling case for itself. It looks good, handles well and was very well equipped. It was also incredibly practical with plenty of room for 4 passengers and luggage with even more space if you folded the seats down.

    It did disappoint slightly with regards to economy though, being sensible I averaged around 43 mpg with a mixture of A-road, dual carriageway and town driving. Although this would no doubt improve as the engine loosened up (it was delivered to me with less than 1000 miles), I was still hoping to see better fuel consumption. My biggest complaint however was price. Admittedly I did ask for a fully loaded test car for the tech issue but even still, £29,615 for a Ford Focus diesel did surprise me.

    Personally, I’d be tempted by a lower spec model with a few choice options to bring the price down. At around £20-£22k and optioned with the adaptive headlights, Sync 2 and with less bling the Focus would be very tempting.

    Pros

    Handles well

    Punchy yet refined diesel

    Styling

    Cons

    Low rent interior plastics

    Worse than expected economy

    Price