Tag: Nissan

All the latest breaking news on Nissan. Browse THEGAYUK’s complete collection of news, articles and commentary on Nissan.

  • The Good, The Bad and The Ugly:  Nissan Micra K11 1992 – 2002

    The Good, The Bad and The Ugly: Nissan Micra K11 1992 – 2002

    The Good, The Bad and The Ugly Nissan Micra K11 1992 – 2002

    NISSAN UK

    This second-generation Micra, for those in the UK at least, was a bit of a dullard. Thankfully the ’90s saw the rise of the grey import. Japanese spec’d cars with a host of goodies that were devoid from our options list. Thanks for nothing Nissan UK!

    What came over was the camp as tits Figaro with an equally gay name. There was also the utilitarian styled Pao but these were based on Micra K10. So nothing really great was to come of the K11.

    Or was it? Thankfully we have the Mitsuoka Viewt. A half-arsed attempt at making a Micra look like Morse’s Mk2 Jaguar. It was both awful and eye-catching at the same time. Sort of what BMC did to the Mini in making it the Riley Elf and Wolseley Hornet but less successfully.

    The 1.3 engine gave the Micra K11 a bit of a useful shove. The same could not be said for the 1 litre. It was typical in its behaviour of Nissan’s other NA engines of the time. Drive it like it’s a Sunday, don’t rev it. It didn’t make a rats arse of a difference if you did and if you did, it sounded as exciting as sticking your head under the water in a bath and farting.

    The K11 Micra with 338 points, won “Car of the Year 1993”, beating its competitor, the Cinquecento by 34 points. Renault’s flop, the Safrane came third.

    1993 was a quiet year for the motor industry.

    It was a car that was devoid of emotion and that appealed to the new motoring masses made up of learner drivers. Driving schools couldn’t get enough of them and chances are, if you were born in the ’70s, you came of age learning to drive one.

    In 1992 a school friend got one and her mother took great delight in telling me that “Sarah has a new  Micra-dot” I had an old 1986 Citroen, it cost me nothing so fuck off Jenny! To be honest, I couldn’t have thought of anything worse than having a Micra back then. Even now, I shudder at the thought.

    Micra K11 isn’t good, bad or ugly. It’s a nothing car. Now, in 2019, if it goes wrong, you thrown it away. Trouble is, they NEVER went wrong. Buy one and use it as a chicken shed. At least it’ll have a purposeful use.

  • The Good, The Bad and The Ugly: Nissan Micra K12 2002 – 2010

    The Good, The Bad and The Ugly: Nissan Micra K12 2002 – 2010

    An irrelevant look at a certain car: Nissan Micra K12 2002 – 2010

    PHOTO: NISSAN UK

    If someone said “Nissan Micra” to you, you’d visualise a queue of traffic. At the front would be a little Micra either being driven by a learner or old lady. In this third guise, Nissan stuck to its guns and refused to invest in dynamics.

    It continued to make the Micra easy to drive. It also made it easy to repair with big plastic bumpers and with those came bodging. Big plastic bumpers covering the majority of the front, made repairs to a smacked in the face Micra easy to disguise. And good job too. Judging by the number of folded in bumpers, parking accidents were quite rife. And why? Because the Micra had grown in size. In doing so, easy to judge extremities of the little hatchback had become lost.

    This was a bad period for Nissan and even worse for the Micra. Quality was lost. I mean, the Micra was never a quality product in the touchy-feely kind of way. You’d never shut the door with your eyes shut and think “sounds like a Golf”.

    Given time, that absurd notion of that idea would completely evaporate anyway when the central locking unit became vocal. VW’s would have just stopped working. Nissan’s just shouted about it in an audible growl of plastic and electrics.

    PHOTO: NISSAN UK

    FYI, You could get some Nissan Micra merchandise. Just thought I’d let you know. To be honest, I’m trying to find some more words for this GBU.

    In the driving of the Micra, I’m trying to think of a descriptive word to save on word count. Foul is pretty good but then so too is mind-numbingly dull. It was a car that was wasted on good tyres. Forget the standard-fit Continentals, fit remoulds! The vague steering could make even the stickiest racing slicks feel lifeless. Imagine a date with a cast member of Love Island that involved trying to make conversation.

    The previous mach of Micra: PHOTO: NISSAN UK

    Inside it was just as bad. The light Nissan standard grey plastics made way for European blacks. Even the white heater control buttons couldn’t lift the spirits of the coffin. Sorry, cabin.

    I’ve never seen a dead person drive a Micra yet, even though some have looked pretty close. You see, unlike Micra K10 and K11, this new model was avoided by the young.

    You’d never look at a Micra and think what a fun funky car it was. Even the CC with its metal folding top couldn’t lift you desire like a Ford StreetKa did. You just wouldn’t look back at it, the K12 is that ugly.

  • The Gay UK Motoring Hounours list of 2016

    What a year 2016 was. Over 30 new cars reviewed ranging from city cars, hatchbacks, pick-up trucks and big and small SUVs.

    In the last year I have enjoyed what I have been given, been dismayed at what I had been given, annoyed and elated all at the same time. Well sort of. Some cars annoyed me in their stupidity of things while some I was full of admiration for how they did things. Sometimes it was because they didn’t do things that made me enjoy them all the more.

    I have sat down and whittled it down to my top 3 of 2016. Let me know if you agree in the comments below.

    3) Nissan Navara NP300 Tekna

     

    Despite my local authority not liking the Navara as I was prevented from entering the dump with garden waste in it, I happened to love the Navara. Its sheer size and car like cabin made it a joy to be in. The fact that with its 360 degree camera made parking a breeze, it was really easy to live with. And you wouldn’t want to damage the Navara. It’s one ruddy handsome bastard.

    Admittedly I did find it a bit wayward in 2 wheel drive mode because I was always unladen. Inner rear wheel spin was always there in the wet. Put it into 4 wheel drive and its manners became impeccable.

    The interior was well thought out and well put together. The price was also enticing and possibly one of the many reasons as to why there are so many on the road. For wall that you get in the Tekna double cab package, it is so very cheap in price.

    On the road it was smoother than an empty pick-up should be. It was also surprisingly quick. Apart from some vocalised engine noise, overall it was never harsh even over poor roads and it was macho. All that was missing on the options list was a testosterone package to make the interior smell of sweat and hard graft. That might have just elevated it to second place.

    2) Peugeot 208 GTi Sport

    Second places goes to a car that did nothing to annoy me. The simple fact that I could pull away without my seatbelt on was refreshingly nice. I know that sounds quite bad and is illegal, but when you want to move the car off the drive way it was so simple to do. The 208 put YOU back in control of decision making. If you so wanted you could also start the engine with it in gear. None of this foot on clutch or brake pedal nonsense.

    What the 208 lacked in niceties and overall refinement it more than made up for it with its sheer brilliant chassis packaging and entertainment ability. A Peugeot this good as a road going go-kart has been a long time coming. The 206 and 207 lacked so much that l thought Peugeot had given up on making fun cars.

    The point and squirt ability of the car made it a hoot to drive fast. It would get a bit hair raising if you pushed it to within an inch of its incredible abilities with a touch of over steer though unlike its great ancestor, the 205, it was all so much more easy to control.

    Yes refinement over long journeys was an after thought in some ways. However if you want comfort in a GTi then don’t buy the Sport edition. And don’t buy it either if you want to carry people in the rear. Personally l don’t really care about rear leg room. I loved the 208.

    1) Jeep Renegade Trialhawk

    If I am honest I didn’t hold out much hope for the Jeep. In the past they had always been a bit hit and miss. Poor build quality and road going dynamics were sometimes in short supply. Enter Fiat who quickly changed that. The Renegade looked good, was well specced and throughly enjoyable.

    There were a few things I didn’t like. Well 2 if I am honest. It didn’t look good in red and the mud splatter on the rev counter still haunts me probably more because it looked like poop and reminded me too much of my day job.

    On the plus side the other little touches and attention to fine details were rewarding and pleasant. It was logical. It is big enough for what you need and yet small enough to make it easy to park. The long drive to Birmingham was a walk in the park and it handled a sudden lane change at speed like a sports car. Something I didn’t expect it to do.

    At first I thought it wasn’t cheap at £31,765 (then) however when compared to its Fiat 500x sibling at £25,935, that extra £6 grand doesn’t seem a lot for what you got. Go the other way and spend another £6000 and you get the Cherokee M Jet we also tested. Suddenly for what you get it all starts looking like really good value.

    And the fact that this has won “Best small 4×4” by 4×4 Magazine for two years in a row says it all. I wasn’t able to test its 4×4 ability but I won’t argue with 4×4 Magazines decision on this one. They know a few things about off roading.

    So there you have it, my top three of 2016. There were some that were close to coming into my top 3 but they just missed it. If I were allowed a 3.5 then l would award that to ‘Giggles” the Renault Twingo. I grinned from ear to ear like a Cheshire cat with that one. That was one car I was very sad to see go back.

     

  • CAR REVIEW | Nissan Navara NP300 Tekna Double Cab

    ★★★★ |  Nissan Navara NP300 Tekna Double Cab

    You’re Just Too Good To Be True….

    And I can’t take my eyes off of you. That is how the song went as covered by Gloria Gaynor. I was dancing to it in the new Nissan Navara in a well known supermarket carpark. The Navara is a handsome truck. It has those classic rugged good looks I like to see in trucks and real men. This is a truck for men. So what the hell am I doing driving it?

    There is something very indescribable about a truck when you try to describe it. It’s not your usual vehicle that you’d associate gay men driving as a pleasure vehicle. It lacks modern niceties that you would get in a premium 4×4 for people. In that I mean soft touch areas and a compliant ride with the ability to tow the caravan or jet ski.

    What you get in the Navara is a truck with attitude. It might be hardwearing and functional but look beyond its purpose and you find that Nissan have given the modern truck driver softening little touches. In this £27,000 truck you get heated leather seats, climate control, cruise control, one touch entry along with another 62 other items of importance in exterior, safety, audio, interior, comfort and technology. This price also includes sunroof, bedliner and interior touches in mats and kick guards. In total though there is far to much to list. What it all adds up to is in the making of an impressive truck for not a lot of money. Nissan must be doing something right here because the roads are littered with Navara’s.

    It keeps on getting better too. The Navara posses size. A lot of size. It’s big. I did worry about leaving it on the street where l live for it engulfed a little French hatchback. At over 5 meters long it is a bit of a brute. Thankfully it comes fitted with Nissan’s 360 degree camera. I never fully appreciated this. On the Micra it seems excessive. In the Pulsar that we tested I felt it had a use. In the Navara is it epic. Parking was a total breeze. If you see someone struggling to park one then you can be safe in the knowledge that they don’t have this bit of kit.

    On the move there was little to complain about. The engine is fuss free. Vocal when pushed, however there is little gained going too far beyond 4000 rpm. The 2.3 litre 4 cylinder twin turbo will hustle the truck along quietly confusing your senses until you look at the speedometer. Nissan claim 112mph max speed and there is little doubting that it would get there without too much fuss.

    The 7 speed automatic did all that was needed. Manual inputs were never needed in normal driving. I am sure off road it would help. Normal mode is rear wheel drive with four wheel drive high-low available on an easy to reach rotating knob. To select it on the move you just turn the knob only stopping if you need to select low ratios. Thankfully there is a a foolproof catch on the low mode. What I did find was that like most 4×4 trucks, in the wet it is best to drive in 4×4. This is only because the rear is unweighted and 450Nm of torque from a lowly 1500rpm has an easy ability to spin the inner wheel. Traction control kicks in quickly to prevent exciting snaking of the rear like a drag racer.

    On the road its ride was surprisingly jiggle free. For a vehicle with a sole purpose to be a hard working horse capable of taking heavy loads, 5 people, tow something and yet not shake your spleen free from the muscles it attaches to, the ride was more than civilised. You could jump in the Navara and just drive cross country in comfort. With documented economy averaging 40.3mpg it wouldn’t need refuelling too often either. Quite an achievement for a heavy vehicle. The on-board computer registered an average of 35mpg while it was with me. l could live with that.

    I don’t doubt the Navara’s ability to go off road. Over hangs at the front were small, The rears a little longer. There is a handy metal bumper that shouldn’t get ripped off as easily as a plastic one would. That said I did take it off road. Down to the back of the garden in fact to load it up with gardening waste. It felt the right thing to do instead of loading up the trusted hatchback. What wasn’t so good was trying to get it into my local council dump. Even in Crocs I was still seen as a heathen by the authoritarian from the council. Apparently even privately owned pick-ups come under the commercial vehicle nonsense. In the end I returned with the trusted hatchback. And Doc Martins.

    There are a few nice touches abound the Navara. The rear seat squab tilts up allowing for items of a certain size that you want protected from prying eyes and the elements. It opens up the rear amazingly. The rear seat though lacks under thigh support for those with long legs. I couldn’t travel on it for long. Personally I do think the chrome inner door handles a bit out of place. There is no other chrome anywhere.

    When it all ended and the keys were handed back to Nissan I searched for jobs in farming. I listen to the Archers so I obviously understand farming issues. I want to be a farmer and drive around my I and all day in a Navara. Ok l don’t want to be a farmer but I’d happily take the Navara for all its ups and downs. I want a pick-up truck.

    Likes
    360 degree camera
    Civilised to drive
    24 month service intervals

    Loathes
    My local authority
    Lacking door protective strips
    Poor under thigh support on rear seats

    The Lowdown
    Car – Nissan Navara NP300 Tekna Double Cab
    Price – £27,163.17 (as tested)
    MPG – 40.3mpg (combined)
    Power – 190 bhp
    0-62mph – 10.8 seconds
    Top Speed – 112 mph
    Co2 – 183 (g/km)

  • CAR REVIEW | Nissan Pulsar Tekna DCi 110

    I can’t believe I am going to say this, however despite its relative absence on the road, the Pulsar isn’t that bad a car. Manufactures don’t really make dreadful cars anymore, they just make them indifferent to others that supposedly set the benchmark.

    CAR REVIEW | Nissan Pulsar Tekna DCi 110

    There were some perceived flaws with the Pulsar that I had from the start. It’s not as well thought out in terms of toys as in the Qashqai. I was expecting more. That said what I was given satisfied my needs.

    Ok so it doesn’t sound great from the start but stick with it and the Pulsar will get better. For passengers, there is an abundance of room. The rear seat leg room with me behind the wheel cannot be matched in this class. Even cars in the next class up will struggle to match it. If I were given the chance of shotgun with the driver or lounging in the back I’d opt for the rear seat.

    Up front as a driver you are offered a few touches of norm for this kind of car. The displays can be altered according to what information you require. The econograph was quite fun to play with. At one point I had the 1.5 DCI 110 humming along to an estimated 74mpg which I think is quite impressive for a car this size. Admittedly that was at a leisurely 62mph with the cruise control on. The average managed over the 200 mile test was 54mpg with my best being 67. I can’t however credit that to the nonintrusive stop start system that saved me 0.20gm of CO2. If you spend more time in traffic you could save more.

    Another nice touch is the easy to use satnav that actually gives you the option to use daytime colours at night and adjusted brightness to suit. I could kiss Nissan’s engineers for this. And this is the thing with the Pulsar, it is some of the little things that make it a better car.

    Sadly the Pulsar suffers two of my pet hates which are poor switch gear illuminations on the doors and pointless carbon fibre trim. This time the trim that gets a mention in the spec sheet is below the rear bumper. Park the car in such a way that you don’t have to look at this and all is good in the world. Goodness also comes in the padding on the door armrest. It’s as soft as a pillow. Boney elbows will not complain. In fact I doubt anyone will moan about the driving position in the Pulsar. It’s all very Nissan and all very matter of fact to the job it has to do.

    Take to the controls and you will see why Nissan has always been easy to drive. In the past they have been a bit woolly, a bit learner driver and tended to appeal to the beige brigade. The gear change is wrist flicking quick and the clutch, while not being the lightest, has a very short pedal travel that further quickens changes both up and down the 6-speed box. If I have one criticism here is that the gate is very close together and until I had learnt to gauge its feel I was slipping it into the wrong gear. 4th became 6th and at one point 5th being 3rd. Thankfully the engine tolerates a lot of revs.

    The steering was nicely weighted. It felt heavier than a lot I have tried but this wasn’t a problem. Again for me, it is these little differences that made the Pulsar likeable.

    What was puzzling was the handling. The traction control system thwarted any kind of fun but pushed hard it could get a little crazy at times, yet switching it off and its road manners improved. It went from a disco bunny on poppers to Kylie to meeting your mother at church on Sunday when switched off. It would kick in when it felt it was at its set limits but the improvements in handling were noted for the better.

    Another nice touch was the stereo increasing in volume as the speed increased and instead of a little, it was noticeable and I liked that. And then there was the 360-degree parking cameras. If you are from the Grand Theft Auto generation that played it from the over the top view you’ll appreciate this. Why more cars don’t have this I do not know. It takes some time to get used to it and what it is interpreting, though once mastered it made for ease of parking without really having to look in the mirrors.

    The nice to use Pulsar is a difficult one to sum up and here lies the problem. It does nothing that makes it stand out from the crowd. It doesn’t annoy you in any way. It’s like a faithful friend who listens to your problems, rubs your shoulders, soothes your elbows and then drives you to get cheesecake. It will never leave you standing alone at the disco. If only it could have some drama to excite it, it might just start to be a major player in this sector of the market.

    Likes

    Price

    360-degree camera

    Rear seat space

    Loathes

    Lacks excitement

    Rear cargo area doesn’t flatten

    Bit austere inside

    The Lowdown

    Car – Nissan Pulsar Tekna DCi 110
    Price – £ 22,245.(as tested)
    MPG – 78.5 mpg (combined)
    Power – 110 bhp
    0-62mph – 11.5 seconds
    Top Speed – 118 mph
    Co2 – 94 (g/km)

  • CAR REVIEW | Nissan Leaf Tekna

    If you see a modern electric car on the roads, there’s a very good chance it’ll be Nissan’s Leaf.  ★★★★

    First available back in 2010 with European sales starting a year later, over 180,000 have been sold in the last five years. With several major manufacturers releasing their own electric cars, is the Leaf still worth considering?

    One thing that hasn’t really changed in the last five years is the Leaf’s distinctive shape. If I’m being kind I’d say it reminded me a little of a Japanese Bullet Train although you do need to squint see the likeness. While not classically handsome, it’s distinctive and easy to recognise as an electric vehicle if you’re after a bit of social smugness.

    It also hides a very roomy interior, thanks in part to the packaging advantages you get with electric cars. With the battery mounted under the floor and the motor being compact, there’s a lot more room than you’d think possible in a car around the size of a Ford Focus.

    I liked the high mounted LCD display for speed as it was right in your line of sight even when looking at the road. There’s also another larger screen in the conventional location that shows charge levels and how quickly you’re draining the battery. A touchscreen in the centre of the dash takes care of the infotainment and proves easy to use if not as sharp to look at as other systems from rivals. Overall the interior is well put together but lacks the premium feel VW do so well.

    Rear seat passengers sit higher than those in the front so they can see out with both leg and headroom very good. The boot is large but disappointingly has a very high load lip; fine for light items but I wouldn’t want to wrestle anything too heavy up there. There’s a couple of canvas bags for the charging leads which hang either side of the boot which is nice but not as nice as a specific compartment as some electric cars have.

    Speaking of charging, you’ll probably want to know how long it takes and how many miles the battery is good for. According to Nissan, you can get over 120 miles out of a single charge but if we’re honest; this is quite tricky to achieve. You’ll need to drive at less than 40 mph with no heating, no air-con and a very gentle touch on the throttle. More realistic is around 80 miles (even I achieved it) if you don’t mind limiting your top speed to around 60 mph.

    Treat it like a petrol car with heavy throttle openings, air-con set to freeze and a good chunk of time spent at 70 mph and you’ll get even less. Still, the Leaf was never intended to be a long distance motorway car and to expect it to perform like one is unfair.

    For the vast majority of people on the vast majority of journeys the Leaf will have more than enough range. Once you do run out of juice, charging time depends heavily on the equipment you’re using. A rapid charger like you might find at motorway services can manage 80% charge in just 30 minutes however these are a lot more industrial than you might find at home.

    The quickest charger Nissan currently offer for home use takes around four hours, the standard offering around eight while plugging it into a normal plug socket will take an agonising twelve hours.

    In practice however, most people won’t use all of the charge in a single day while fast charge points are springing up all over the country. Even supermarkets are installing more and more of them whether you slum it in Asda or go posh in Waitrose.

    In the week I had the car, I never had less than twenty miles range when I parked up at a charger eliminating any range anxiety I might have had. Further helping this is Nissan’s ‘Carwings’ app which allows you to check charge levels remotely and even turn on the air-con from your smartphone. Impressive stuff.

    Those that enjoy driving will find the Leaf much better than they might expect. Compared to the Renault Zoe I tested recently, the suspension felt well set up offering good levels of comfort while still feeling pretty agile around bends. There was also none of the under-damped feeling you got from the French car – any body movement after a bump felt well controlled with no wallow.

    I never found myself yearning to go for a blast in the Leaf but neither was I ever unhappy with how it drove. Even acceleration is pretty brisk up to about 50 mph where it starts to tail off like most electric cars.

    All but lowly Visia trim get alloys, body coloured mirrors and privacy glass while the higher trims add bigger, snazzier wheels along with more and more toys. Although the top Tekna trim I tested was rammed with equipment including a punchy Bose stereo, incredibly handy around view monitor that gives a virtual bird’s eye view of the car and heated leather seats, most people would probably be happy with Acenta models that are £2000 less. The main consideration for many will be with regards to the battery; do you pay £5000 to own it outright or lease it on a monthly basis?

    Leasing may seem like a good option to protect yourself from potentially pricey battery replacement but they are proving very reliable. Some cab firms are reporting over 150,000 miles from the original pack with very little in the way of degradation while electric cars need much less in the way of servicing too.

    Although it may be five years old, the Leaf is still a compelling option not just for those after an electric car but a roomy hatchback too. While it naturally gives the kind of smooth, serene acceleration electric cars do so well, the Leaf also offers drivers a little bit of fun should the road get twisty. Apart from that high load lip, it’s very practical too while running costs will be minimal. Motoring doesn’t get more sensible than this.

    Pros

    Relaxing to drive

    Practical

    Peanuts to run

    Cons

    Variable range

    High load lip

    Top models pricey

    The Lowdown

    Car – Nissan Leaf Tekna

    Price – £25,960 on the road (after £5,000 government grant)

    Power – 110bhp

    0-60 – 10.2 seconds

    Top Speed – 94mph

  • Valentines Day Land Rover Style

    Jaguar & Land Rover have confirmed the Jaguar C-X75, Range Rover Sport SVR and Defender Big Foot will feature in the new Bond film SPECTRE. The Jag will be the baddies’ wheels for the main car chase against the Aston Martin DB10 in Rome while the Landies have been spotted in Austria. Jaguar’s press site interestingly refers to C-X75s plural rather than singular. Whether the multiple vehicles will be needed for destructive purposes or if there are a couple of C-X75s chasing/being chased by Bond is something we will have to wait to find out.

    (more…)

  • The Week In Cars – Ferrari or Porsche?

    Porsche have shown us the hottest Cayman yet, the GT4. As suggested by spy shots, it gains a much more aggressive body kit with a fixed rear wing along with 20 inch wheels.

    (more…)