Search results for: “ ”

  • LISTEN: James Arthur’s Homophobic Rap

    A YouTube Clip Has emerged of James Arthur’s homophobic slur ‘You F**king Queer’ in a rap.

    The singer was responding to an underground rapper, Mickey Worthless, who criticised Arthur’s decision to enter X Factor in 2012. Arthur responded with a rap which included the gay slur, ‘You f**king queer’.

    We managed to track down an alleged version of the rap, in which you can hear the slur at 3:10

    The track which is not authorised by Sony, contains the lyrics:

    ‘You probably want to put your stinky dick in me… you f**king queer.’

    And

    ‘Hey Mickey what a pity, you don’t understand – I’ll do 20 minutes and I’m making 20 grand… I am a genuine talent, I am not a brand’.

    In a tweet the Impossible singer said:

    ‘I just have to say I’m extremely disappointed in myself for being so naive with the diss track I made for an unknown rapper recently..

    ‘Some of the things said in this rap can be mistaken for homophobic slurs and I assure you homophobia is something I do not believe in

    ‘I have many many gay friends. In rap feuds/rap disses the words I used have a different intent. This is a straight man I was attacking

    ‘A straight man who littered his track with severe homophobic slurs towards me.. Like I said though it was a rap diss ..

    ‘And in no way a reflection of my true character.. I’ve heard I’ve offended Matt Lucas who’s work I have always admired and that is a blow.

    ‘Deeply deeply sorry to any gay or lesbian people out there.

    ‘Plus Rylan is one of my best mates and he is as gay as they come! #LOVE’

    He then went on to explain further:

    ‘Any offence I have caused by using the term ‘queer’ in my rap battle with MC Worthless… would just like to make it completely clear that it was not meant in anyway as a reference to homosexuality.

    ‘I realise where the term has come from in meaning.. but used in the context of the rap battles I have grown up with it has come to mean something completely different..

    ‘That said, I understand why it could cause offence and that definitely wasn’t my intention.”

    ‘Learnt a lot this year. Hurt a lot this year. F**ked up a lot this year. Loved a lot this year. Lost a lot this year. Roll on 2014. #LOVE’

     

    And he then suggested that the controversial rap was not his only regret from this year.

    The singer is currently promoting his new single Recovery.

    Today James Arthur officially quit Twitter saying that his HQ would now take care of his social media, after an explosive public feud with Frankie Boyle.

     

     

     

     

  • OPINION: Why James Arthur Deserves Our Compassion, Not Our Outrage

    Ridiculous remarks spilling from the mouths of X-factor contestants is nothing new, so I was hardly shocked to hear that last year’s winner, James Arthur, offended the gay community this week by referring to an underground rapper, in a rap battle, as a “f*cking queer”.

    Along with most, my initial lack of surprise was soon replaced by irritation at James Arthur’s ignorance and his homophobic comments. There is always more to the story, however, and I was compelled to read Arthur’s tweets to see what other contentious things he might be saying. But upon doing so, my irritation was soon jolted by a far softer sentiment: pity.

    The pressures of fame

    As laymen, it is easy for us to overlook the fact that being thrust into the public eye is a cruel cross to bear. The pressures of shooting to fame can only be understood by the relatively limited number of individuals who have gone through the same thing. And yet, from the resentful perspective of the rest of us, these people have been handed everything on a plate.

    Before straight-to-stardom reality TV shows came along, the road to fame was a gradual one. It allowed travellers to gradually acclimatise to the changing conditions. This may have been a gentler route for the stars themselves, but not a quick buck for record producers, like Simon Cowell, who soon discovered that they could sell greater quantities of records much more quickly if they engineered a machine that creates fame overnight.

    In case it’s not obvious, the machine I’m referring to is shows like the X-Factor. In the end, it doesn’t matter who wins the ‘competition’. It’s simple; those who are popular will make money and be signed, those who aren’t, won’t. While some contestants cope with the atmospheric adjustment far better than others, the real winners will always be the record labels.

    If in doubt, shout louder

    James Arthur is a man wracked by insecurity. Many of his interactions on Twitter are retweets from fawning fans, shouting about how much they love him. In equal measure, he rises to small jeers from ‘haters’, biting back in self-defense where he would be better advised to grow a thick skin and leave well enough alone. In both cases, he is trying to affirm his self-confidence to the outside world, but his actions have quite the opposite effect.

    Even Arthur’s apology for his comments reeked of doubt, as he used it to further slam the rapper Micky Worthless: “I just have to say I’m extremely disappointed in myself for being so naive with the diss track I made for an unknown rapper recently.” This is in equal parts an apology and a vehicle with which to affirm the ‘unknown’-ness of Worthless. And no doubt, mixing the two will spark more outrage, but it shouldn’t. It should spark sympathy.

    Though Arthur is obviously trying to fix his mistake, his lack of enlightenment comes through so clearly that I cannot help but pity him. Rather cringeworthily, he says: “…Rylan (Clark) is one of my best mates and he is as gay as they come!”
    Ouch. This is obviously well-intended, and yet, it misses the mark so catastrophically that it only demonstrates further Arthur’s narrow-minded view of what it means to be gay. And is this his fault? In part, yes I suppose it is. But not entirely.
    James Arthur’s comments are ridiculous and ill-judged, no question, but we should not be too quick to shame him for it… his comments point, broadly, to a poor understanding of what it means to be gay in the 21st century. More directly, it points to a man lacking support from his management. This is not demonstrative of somebody enjoying his success, but someone buckling under the weight of it.
    Ill-equipped to cope
    As with many reality TV stars (Susan Boyle being the most obvious example) Arthur is just one in a long line of vulnerable individuals succumbing to the temptations of fame thrust upon them by greedy record labels who promise a shortcut to success. But like many others, Arthur also lacks the inherent tools necessary to cope with this new, upside-down lifestyle. It is very easy for us to recline into our sofas and say “Bad man; homophobic James Arthur.” But let’s face it; he made a mistake, and if we weren’t all looking at him, nobody would have noticed it.
    The real ones to watch here are those behind the scenes; those raking in the cash, with none of the public fall-out. Do they give their James Arthurs and their SuBos effective media training? Clearly not. In this case particularly, Arthur is drowning in insecurities. And his record label is not only allowing it, but encouraging it.
    Indulge me in a quick dissection. Syco Music (the label to which Arthur is signed, and Simon Cowell’s cash cow) has allowed him to tweet on his own behalf, clearly without enforcing any sort of social media guidelines. They then let him rise to the bait of many ‘haters’, like Worthless, with contentious, homophobic remarks. Finally, they permit him to release a poorly worded apology, sparking further outrage, and only once all this is done do they withdraw his Twitter privileges, like a naughty child. Bad James.
    But is all of this oversight or intention? It’s almost as though Syco Music are deliberately allowing Arthur to dig himself into a hole. After all, no PR is bad PR, right?
    Don’t be too quick to bite
    James Arthur’s ignorance seems to stem from a lack of common sense, this is obvious. But it is not cause for outrage; it simply highlights that, as a community, gay people still have a lot of work to do. While indignation is the knee-jerk reaction, instead we should be inspired to educate the ignorant.
    Rather than wasting energy on the benign idiocy of reality TV show contestants who don’t know any better, we should perhaps be more mindful, and reserve it for the real acts of injustice out there. I’m talking about right-wing policies in government, homophobic attacks on gays in Russia or money-hungry record producers; those who exploit vulnerable individuals, laughing all the way to the bank while the rest of us, blind to their wealth, react too quickly and tear their helpless scapegoats to shreds.
    @WillHillier

    Opinions expressed in this article may not reflect those of THEGAYUK, its management or editorial teams. If you’d like to comment or write a comment, opinion or blog piece, please click here.

  • MSNBC suspends Alec Baldwin’s late night show

    MSNBC suspends Alec Baldwin’s late night show

    MSNBC has yanked Alec Baldwin’s show off the air for 2 weeks following an incident earlier in the week

    Yesterday GLAAD accused 30 Rock Actor, Alec Baldwin of ‘Degrading Gay People’ after video footage emerged which showed him using an F word. The actor insists the word he used was ‘Fathead’.

    In the video the 30 Rock actor is heard calling a photographer a ‘cksucker’ although a media storm has been created after it was suggested that Baldwin actually called a photographer a ‘Cksucking F*g head’. Baldwin is insisting that he said ‘Fathead’ and has threatened to sue TMZ for suggesting that he used a homophobic word.

    Baldwin said that acoustic analysis of the recording proves the word said was ‘fathead.’

    However MSNBC have pulled his new show Up Late With Alec Baldwin for 2 weeks, in a post on MSNBC.com the network shared a personal statement from Baldwin, in which he addresses the comments he made in the week.

    ‘I did not intend to hurt or offend anyone with my choice of words, but clearly I have – and for that I am deeply sorry. Words are important. I understand that, and will choose mine with great care going forward. What I said and did this week, as I was trying to protect my family, was offensive and unacceptable. Behavior like this undermines hard-fought rights that I vigorously support. I understand “Up Late” will be taken off the schedule for tonight and next week.

    I want to apologize to my loyal fans and to my colleagues at msnbc – both for my actions and for distracting from their good work. Again, please accept my apology.’

    MSNBC has not given any reason to why it has suspended the show – nor has responded to requests for comment.

  • Glaad accuses Baldwin of “degrading gay people” new new anti-gay slur storm

    Glaad accuses Baldwin of “degrading gay people” new new anti-gay slur storm

    Alec Baldwin is being accused of ‘degrading’ gay people by GLAAD in new video released by TMZ.

    Alec Baldwin
    CREDIT: Joe Seer / Bigstock

    In the video, the 30 Rock actor is heard calling a photographer a ‘c**ksucker’ although a media storm has been created after it was suggested that Baldwin actually called a photographer a ‘C**ksucking F*g head’. Baldwin is insisting that he said ‘Fathead’ and has threatened to sue TMZ for suggesting that he used a homophobic word.

    Baldwin said that acoustic analysis of the recording proves the word said was ‘fathead.’
    You can hear the audio here:

    In tweets released by GLAAD the organisation said:

    ‘Mr. Baldwin can’t lend his support for equality on paper, while degrading gay people in practice,

    ‘It’s clearly time Mr. Baldwin listens to the calls from so many LGBT people and allies to end this pattern of anti-gay slurs.’
    Baldwin took his own Tweet feed to reply:

    ‘If c’sucker offends, then I apologize. Anti-gay? Never.’

    He later delete that message and offered:

    ‘1-Rich Ferraro from @glaad informs me that c’sucker is an anti-gay epithet. In which case I apologize and will retire it from my vocabulary,’ he tweeted.

    ‘2- you learn something new every day.’

    The incident happened outside his apartment, after the sentencing of his stalker Genevieve Sabourin in New York.

  • PHONE REVIEW | Nokia Lumia 1020

    At the moment, it seems like you cant open Metro or Evening Standard without seeing an ad for the new Lumia 1020…being billed as the photographers phone.

    Given the chance to test drive one was too good a chance to miss and most unlike me, I waited patiently for it to drop through my letterbox.

    To cut to the chase, I wasn’t disappointed – at least with the camera aspect. I’m no fan of any phone other than my precious iPhone. I love the OS, the interface, the size, its so simple and intuitive. So, I struggled with this handset as a Windows phone. I am not keen on the interface, the way it works, etc is not my cup of tea at all – but can see how it appeals to some.

    I actually grew to love the bright yellow casing and the massive screen – coming in at around 130mm high and 71mm wide. It weighs a mere 158 grams and feels good to handle. The matt case (available in yellow and black) is good to hold – vital in any camera… or phone.

    And there lies my issue. There is nothing amazing here in terms of a phone but it is one hell of a camera. This is a true case of a brilliant camera with a phone attached. It has a unique cushioning system around the camera that has suspended optics so you can take blur free photos and stable videos. You can hear this in action as its ball-baring based.

    All the usual phone functions are here, messaging, email, games, music, social networking and on occasion even phone calls…but it’s an amazing camera.

    This is a 41 mega pixel camera – there are stand alone cameras out there that don’t have that many pixels! It has a Xenon flash that illuminates for days and a screen that shows you the results instantly and at a decent size.

    There are numerous additions on this phone, including panorama mode, creative studio that allows you to edit on the go, smart cam that allows you to shoot sequences simply and easily, and a good, old fashioned basic camera, but with one hell of a massive screen.

    What camera on the market today has a screen of this size? Regardless of the extras or the phone options, the screen alone is a deal sealer! How many times have you taken an image but cant see it on your teeny tiny screen and its not until you finally manage to download to your computer that you realise how crap they are? And by then its too late to take another, but with this little beauty…

    I have several cameras including a Canon DSLR and a handy little pocket seized Leica but this camera/phone is wonderful. It has one hell of a camera, simply taking beautiful images with the added advantage of having a camera included. You can snap, edit, upload and share in one easy piece of tech.

    I may not be a convert to Windows phones (it needs so much work on its interface) but I can forgive that because of the possibilities this camera offers….

    Buy one, now!

    Available from: Three, O2, Vodafone, EE, Phones 4U, Carphone Warehouse
    RRP: £549.99

  • COLUMN | It’s okay to be different, isn’t it?

    My school days are such a long time ago now that I barely remember them, or is it that I just blotted them out?

    They seem to belong to a different person who has absolutely nothing to do with the person I am now. I had no idea I would turn out to be gay, though anyone with half a brain could probably have figured it out. I was dancing (in my pram) before I could walk, singing perfectly in tune before I had the slightest idea what I was singing about (all lyrics reduced to lalala), and my favourite films were those involving plenty of song and dance, Fred and Ginger in particular. From an early age, all I wanted to do was dance.

    This always singled me out as being a little different, but my earliest days at primary school were surprisingly happy. It was a mixed school and the other boys didn’t seem to mind that I preferred hanging out with the girls and not playing football with them. Well, they probably reasoned, at least they were spared having to pick me to be in their team. My school was in the middle of a highly middle class part of my home town, and the other pupils all came from the same area. Our parents all knew each other. It was a safe and cosy environment. Even so, though I don’t ever remember feeling physically threatened at my primary school, I had to learn to toss off the occasional jibes about being a sissy and a big girl. However in my last year or two, when I was sitting my eleven plus and preparing to go either to an all-boys Grammar School if I passed, or an all-boys Public School if I didn’t, I started to be picked on that bit more. School was not the fun place it had been when I was younger.

    I had been taking tap dancing lessons since I was five and would constantly sail through my various exams. Dancing was not a boy’s pursuit though. The penny dropped when I looked around at one of the annual dance school displays and realised I was the only boy on stage. That was probably behind my decision to give up dancing lessons. l My dancing teacher, a friend of the family whom I knew as Auntie Joy, was pressing my mother and father to get me to start ballet. She had been a professional ballet dancer herself and an Honours Associate of the Royal Academy of Dance. She thought that, physically, I had the perfect proportions to be a ballet dancer. However, no amount of cajoling on the part of my parents was to make me change my mind. I had decided that there was no way I was going to be going to ballet class when I got to my next school, and, it has to be admitted, my parents didn’t try that hard to persuade me otherwise. It had been bad enough been singled out for going to tap dancing lessons. I was hardly going to make things worse for myself by doing ballet.

    Secondary school (the local grammar) was to prove a terrible culture shock. It was my first exposure to boys from the other side of town, boys who were bright enough to pass their eleven plus, some of whom lived on council estates, and who had built up their own set of tools to deal with the harsher environment they came from. Grammar School was pretty egalitarian in that respect. Boys attending came from all over the town, not one single catchment area. No doubt to many of them, it appeared I had a privileged existence, and in some ways I had. We holidayed in Greece (staying with my grandparents there) when air travel was only for the rich; my father ran his own business and drove a Jaguar. This was enough to single me out, but it probably didn’t help that, though I no longer went to dance classes, I maintained a keen interest in theatre and dance, and would often participate in local operatic society productions, for which my father was musical director. No doubt, all this would have been forgotten if I’d been a keen football player or rugby player, but I had absolutely no interest in sport.

    At primary school I had made friends with all the girls. Here there were no girls. I found it hard to make friends and I became an easy target. Nobody actually called me gay (well the word didn’t exist back then), but I was called a sissy and a poof, without any of us really understanding what that meant. You have to remember homosexuality was illegal in those days. There was no way I was going to admit to myself, let alone anyone else, that I was gay, and I still assumed that I would meet a girl, get married and have children. I knew virtually nothing about sex. Children were much more innocent in those days. Still the other boys sensed I was different, and this is what separated me from them.

    I wasn’t the only boy to be bullied and ostracised though. There were others, who found it harder to get on than me, and I briefly befriended some of them, though ignominiously dumped them when I realised that being friends with them was doing me no good whatsoever. I remember one boy committed suicide while I was there. He was an odd, skinny, intellectual boy, with National Health glasses held together with Elastoplast, evidently from a poor family. Nobody would have anything to do with him, and even the teachers teased him. When he died, there was an announcement in assembly, but the whole sorry business was glossed over. There was never any attempt to tackle bullying in the school, and, truth to tell, the teachers often colluded in it, the idea being that a certain amount of bullying was good for the softer kids, that it was character building.

    My elder brother had gone to the same school 4 years before me, and, though we fought like cat and dog at home, he was to prove to be my protector in my early years at Grammar school. He couldn’t be there all the time of course, but at least I had his protection on the walk home from school, and more than once he turned on boys who were calling me names. I don’t know how I’d have coped without him. I wouldn’t have known how to fight back and, other than my brother, my only defence was speed. I could outrun most of the boys in my year, a fact that was first brought home to me on the day we had some athletics tests. To the amazement of all the other boys, who had assumed all sissy boys were useless at sport, I came first in my year in the 100 and 220 (yards, not metres in those days) and also tested well in the long jump. My games master encouraged me to join the athletics team, but I flatly refused, not because I didn’t enjoy running and jumping, but because I didn’t want to spend any more time than I had to with boys who bullied and threatened me. So, for the second time, I didn’t do something I was good at out of fear, out of fear for what the other boys would do to me. I had earned a somewhat grudging respect because I could run, so the physical bullying stopped, but the verbal jibes continued. I was a sensitive child and it hurt. It’s taken me a long time to learn to ignore people who seek to hurt with words. Indeed the scars can take a lifetime to heal.

    The only place I felt safe was in music classes, and my viola teacher, who knew how horrific games lessons were for me, ended up programming my viola lessons at the same time as the games periods, telling the headmaster there were no other slots available. I was eternally grateful to him. A kind, gentle, quietly spoken man, with weirdly wax like hands and fingers, I have no doubt that, though married, he was gay, not that I knew or guessed that at the time, but looking back, it seems plausible enough. I’m sure he recognised a kindred spirit. Still, in a more accepting environment, maybe I would not have accepted his offer of programming my viola classes so I could skip games. I admit I rather regret not participating in sport at school now. To this day, I feel a mild sense of panic when someone throws a ball at me, or puts a bat in my hand. I feel I’ve missed out.

    When my brother went to university, I had to find a way to survive without him. I did so by if not actually mixing with the bad boys in school, by allying myself with them.I started smoking, let it be believed that I had a string of girlfriends. I’d buy girlie magazines like Mayfair, and make sure the other boys got to see them, though, in all honesty, nothing in their pages really did much for me. Still, they had the desired effect. I started bunking off school too. Suddenly I was cool and the bullying stopped.

    But of course I wasn’t cool. My schoolwork started to suffer. Much to the mortification of my parents, I was hauled up in front of the headmaster on more than one occasion. Though I managed to pass 6 out of 7 of my ‘O’ levels (we took a maximum of 7 in those days), I didn’t get the grades I should have done. I went from being one of the top three boys in my class to one of the bottom few. My ‘A’ level results were even worse, and I ended up having to go to a college to re-study and re-sit my English and French, in an attempt to improve my grades.

    I suppose I was luckier than many. I never actually got beaten up (because I could runs so fast), and most of what I had to deal with was just words. Just words? I remember shouting back at my tormentors, “Sticks and stones can hurt my bones, but words can never hurt me.” But it wasn’t true. Words can and do hurt. They hurt me; both emotionally at the time and also in stopping me doing things I was good at and should have enjoyed. I don’t know if I’d ever have been a great ballet dancer or a great sprinter, but the point is I never got to find out, nor did I find my true academic potential. Hell-bent on survival, education was all but forgotten. How many other young people are not doing well at school because of bullying and peer pressure? I have no doubt it is thousands. We hear of the tragic cases, of those , like that young boy at my school, who are driven to take their own lives, and that one young person should feel death is the only way out is reason enough to ensure we, as adults, do everything in our power to stop another child taking their own life. We should also be considering the wider implications of children not reaching their full potential because of the way they are treated by their peers at school. Children feel that they need to fit in, and respond easily to peer pressure. What we need to do is celebrate diversity. We still live in a culture where the boy who is good at football is going to be feted and revered, whilst the boy who is good at ballet is more likely to be ridiculed and called names. We need to tell children that you can be different and still fit in, but until we can celebrate diversity in the adult world, how can we hope to make things better for children?

    Today is Stand Up day. Make sure you stand up against bullying.

  • Nick Grimshaw and Naomi Campbell Vogue

    Radio 1 DJ and Supermodel turned reality show judge Naomi Campbell vogued for their lives this morning and Tweeted the results.

    One of the world’s most famous Supermodels Naomi Campbell dropped by the Radio 1 studios to chat with Nick Grimshaw this morning.

    The model is currently fronting a brand new programme on Sky Living called The Face, where wannabe models fight it out to win the competition. Bit like ANTM, but British and with Naomi, Erin O’Connor and Caroline Winberg

    But the fabulous pair couldn’t contain themselves so did a bit of “Thursday” for the cameras – very fashion sweetie.

    Watch The Face on Sky Living on Monday 18th November 2013

  • OPINION | Putin’s Peace Prize

    Having allowed myself some time take in the news of Putin’s Nobel Peace Prize nomination I find I have reached no greater conclusion than the; ‘What the what?’ of my initial reactionary facial expressions.

    But let’s allow credit where is credit due here, please. First off all taking into account the merits of the individual case; outrageous skirting of human rights aside.

    For his work in the promotion of conflict resolution and the supported maintenance of peace and tranquillity, both at home and abroad; Putin receives nomination. For stopping bloodshed through political discussion; Putin receives nomination. For being a generally all-round nice guy who continuously advocates for a more resolved and peaceful planet; Putin receives nomination, and I think we would all agree that any such works from an individual are beyond acceptable cause to receive such a resounding applause.

    However, the merit of any case has its failings and here, laden in controversy, one barely knows where to begin. Putin is currently serving a 6 year term as president of Russia following a change of law that increased presidential term-age (theoretical term, that one) from 4 years, in 2012, amidst claims of fraud and irregularity by, both, opposition activists and the wider political community.

    In 2006 Putin received widespread condemnation for, what was considered as, a crackdown on Media Freedoms in Russia, following the shooting of an independent Russian Journalist who had exposed corruptions within the army and its conducts in Chechnya.

    In 2012 Putin backed stricter legislations of the Russian LGBT community, with further laws on Homosexual propaganda coming into place in 2013 and all the generally ongoing palavers there with.

    To name but a few.

    Now one could argue, here, that the very “blood shed” by Russian individuals striving for the right to live; speak and love freely, is cause enough to deny a claim for such an honour. Furthermore, the application of this law to visiting ‘non-Russians’, whose privilege to express and speak themselves with the same freedoms, perhaps, as they would enjoy at home, well…one could argue that that dissolves the claim for peace and tranquillity amongst all people on the “planet”. Not to mention the Russian role as the main supplier of arms to Basha al-Assad’s regime, in Syria.

    So we have, here, a man who’s every claim to honour is subject to rebuttal of the highest order. For, there appears to be very few instances where the promotion of such peaceful and resolved conflict, have not been undermined or undone by the very actions of his own legislation within government which, at the most basic level, aim to dissolve the rights of Humans to enjoy the privilege of a free life.

    To allow, to the point of promotion, such hatred and discrimination to exist; openly and in your name, opposes the very essence of peace and the very notion of prize. The ability to nominate an individual regardless, therefore, raises into question the very essence of what the Nobel Peace Prize is and, furthermore, taking into account not only recent but historical nuances in nomination, the validity of its award.

    The current atrocities faced by individuals in Russia for the pure nature of their love seems cause enough that such a nomination could barely even be considered that, surely, would be the Nobel Peace Prize in action?

    Opinions expressed in this article may not reflect those of THEGAYUK, its management or editorial teams. If you’d like to comment or write a comment, opinion or blog piece, please click here.

  • JESSIE J: Switches On The Christmas Lights

    Singer Jessie J kicks off Christmas celebrations on Oxford Street, in London, by switching on the lights.

     

    Bestselling British artist Jessie J kick started the Christmas season by wowing shoppers with an explosive performance and admitting it has always been a dream to switch on the world famous Oxford Street lights.

    Jessie J says,

    ‘I always used to make my parents bring me to Oxford Street to see the Christmas lights so it’s an honour to actually be switching them on this year. I spend a lot of time shopping on Oxford Street and this year will be no different. The lights switch-on is a prestigious part of the festive season for Londoners and I’m proud to be a part of it.’

    Illuminating the world’s most iconic high street with a new £1.5 million light scheme, and lighting up the entire Selfridges building in spectacular style, Jessie J performed in front of thousands of excited shoppers and flicked the switch on the brand new Christmas lights display along the world’s most iconic high street.

     

    Christmas cheer really did start here, as thousands of shoppers watched high octane performances by Jessie J, supported by X Factor winner James Arthur and pop sensation Conor Maynard, at the globally renowned Oxford Street Christmas lights switch-on hosted by the world’s best department store, Selfridges.

    Remarkable circus theatrics made the event truly memorable, with eclectic performers Gifford’s Circus giving a real twist to the evening’s celebration. A breath-taking lights display lit up the iconic Selfridges building, celebrating its ‘Destination Christmas’ campaign.

     

  • OPINION | The issue with dictionaries’ definition of the word gay

    There is one thing that really annoys me. It doesn’t quite turn me into an aggressive homosexual but it doesn’t half infuriate me. The offending thing is when the word gay is used as a synonym for stupid, lame, rubbish or sh**, basically.

    It was with great disappointment that I came across an update on this fine magazine’s Facebook page that exposed the dictionary listing of the word gay on Apple’s computer operating systems. It lists the word gay as being “foolish” and “stupid”. I will, of course, state that it has the usual definitions of gay listed, but this is a worrying development, particularly at a time when the word is used negatively so casually amongst young people (and some older ones too).

    As you’ll pick up in some of my previous writings for THEGAYUK, I run an LGBTQ youth support charity and work hard to educate young people on the use of the word gay. I’ve spoken to many youth groups, parents, and professionals about the way in which gay is flung around as an insult or put down, and spent much time educating people on how to use the word appropriately or challenge its negative use. I feel that the way gay is listed in Apple’s dictionary goes some way to undo or undermine those efforts.

    Apple is not the only offender, though; the Oxford Dictionary, although putting the words “often offensive” in front, also list the word gay as meaning “foolish” or “stupid”. In general, I am not easily offended but I find the dictionary listing unacceptable. Perhaps it is true that dictionaries should list the way in which words are used rather the way they should be, but I am still uncomfortable with this definition. I have actually referred young people to the dictionary to look up what gay actually means. Now it’s defined as meaning “foolish” or “stupid” I will no longer be able to do that.

    In Apple’s defence, I am aware that their dictionary entries come from several different sources and that it must be difficult to keep tabs on every entry. Apple is also known for being LGBT friendly so they can perhaps be let off for this oversight. I have confidence in Apple removing that particular definition or at least making an alteration now that they have been made aware of it. However, as for the Oxford Dictionary, I am a bit more disappointed. In my view gay does not equate to being foolish or stupid. It refers to sexuality or being light hearted and care free. Despite mentioning that the negative use is often offensive, it doesn’t make it an acceptable definition. To use the word in the way that these dictionaries define it, they are being pretty gay themselves.

    Opinions expressed in this article may not reflect those of THEGAYUK, it’s management or editorial teams. If you’d like to comment or write a comment, opinion or blog piece, please click here.

  • Apple’s and Oxford University Press dictionary defines gay as “foolish” and “stupid”

    Apple’s dictionary lists the word ‘gay’ to mean Foolish and Stupid in software found on its computer operating systems.

    The computer and Smartphone giant has landed itself in hot water after it was discovered that the word gay is described in its dictionary as Foolish and Stupid.

    The description was found after a 15 year-old student in Massachusetts in the US discovered the pejorative use of the word gay during an assignment for school. The student, Becca Gorman has started a campaign to ask Apple to remove the offensive definition reports the MetroWest Daily News.

    In a letter to the company, Becca Gorman, whose parents are lesbians, asked Apple’s CEO Tim Cook to remove the informal explanation.

    “I assume that you are a pro-gay company, and would never intend for any one of your products to be as offensive as this definition was.’ Gorman wrote.

    “Even with your addition of the word informal, this definition normalises the terrible derogatory twist that many people put on the word ‘gay’.”

    Within an hour a representative called Ms Gorman:

    “They told me it’s so hard to track the dictionaries they’re getting sources from, and that they were also shocked themselves.”

    Apparently, Apple sources its Dictionary’s from four different sources.

    Speaking to TheGayUK a spokesperson for the company said:

    “We license our content from the Oxford University Press, which is acknowledged in our preferences panel within the app.”

    In June this year a petition drew attention to an app available on Apple’s app store, Setting Captives Free, which offered users a ‘gay cure’. The app was removed from the app store within 24 hours after 50,000 people signed the petition.

    The Oxford University Press (OUP) Dictionary also defines the word gay as foolish, stupid, or unimpressive, however the OUP uses the caveat: ‘informal, often offensive’

    The British English Dictionary within the Dictionary App does not contain the Stupid or Foolish definition.